AK RAM said:
I think singles are great depending on what you want to do with your truck. Heck, I liked them so much I went through 5 of them. :-laf
I think sometimes people forget that twin configurations were originally invented so you can have the massive flow of a large single without loosing good spool-up capability. The way twins were made back in the day did just that. A lot of the problem today is that people have changed things too much over the years and have lost that characteristic. A lot of the talk of lag with twins is the result of kit manufacturers going to increasingly larger and larger secondaries in order to squeeze out a little more flow with a little less drive pressure. That is the result of competition…"My twins are better than your twins. " You have to have something to measure to quantify "better", and with twins, all you have is max flow and drive pressure. The easiest way to increase flow and reduce drive pressure at the same time is to go to a bigger secondary. When you add bigger secondaries, obviously lag is going to go up considerably.
A smaller secondary like a 35 or a S300 is going to provide absolutely awesome spool-up on a set of twins as long as the wastegate is not set to open too early and will still flow plenty of air. Are you planning on running 80 lbs of boost or more? If not, you don’t need a B1-2-04 or a 40 on top. Your not after bragging rights here on who has the biggest set……. . of turbos. If lag is your concern, go back to basics. Just because so-and-so says the "latest and greatest modified turbo from…. . has great spool-up", that doesn’t mean it will work great in a set of twins, yet we increasingly see these turbos turning up in twin kits. You want small on top…. . that is how they were designed to run. If you get away from that, well, you simply loose the characteristics that made twins great to start with. The Piers towing twins and the BD Power twins will light your hair on fire they spool-up so fast and you can still run 55 to 60 lbs of boost efficiently. Internal wastegate modifications and external wastegates take care of all drive pressure issues with smaller top turbos. Also, the smaller the top turbo, the more reliable/tougher it will be in the end…. . less rotating mass. Don't just take my word for it…. . talk to Piers or John at BD and then apply a little common sense to the decision process. You will be surprised what you come up with.
Another point I think people sometimes forget about is the air density coming from a set of twins. You hear a lot of talk about singles "will flow efficiently to 55lbs of boost. " Well sure it may, but the density you get from dual stage compression can not be matched by any single no matter how big it is or how much it will flow. When talking EGT cooling power, singles and twins are not in the same league and really can't be compared. Singles are great and technology advances over the last 5 years alone have made some of them awesome, but it is still a single and will still cool like a single whether it costs $1100 or $3200. 50 lbs of boost from a single still within its map will generally not cool as well as 40 lbs of boost from twins.
Just my $. 02.
You guys should really listen to this guy.
The fact of the matter is no matter what single you have, if you run 50 psi it will not be efficient (i. e. > 75%). There are three things that matter in a turbocharger, one is the compressor outlet air density, drive pressure compared to manifold pressure and its rotating mass. I challenge anyone to develop a single charger developing 50 psi of boost at 350°F before the intercooler.
Sure anyone can find a turbocharger that can hit 60psi, but can someone design a system that can not only hit that pressure but do it efficiently and flow enough air to support the engine. Soon I predict that we'll see a number of products come to market not to increase your boost but to decrease your boost but produce more power. Boost pressures mean absolutely nothing.
I ask everyone to do their own research and don't believe the hype on anything otherwise you will be disappointed.
For example who would of believed our Super B turbo flows equally the same amount of air the Turbonetics Jammer2 setup, yet our compressor map is almost 25% larger in the surge direction. Plus the map goes clear into efficient pressure ratios over 4. 2. All this with a wastegate as well, plus it we think it spools better. With all this we only feel our turbo is suitable for 400HP, sure it can make more but not the way we want it to.
With turbo's you just can't keeping on increasing the compressor wheel size without changing the turbine wheel size as well. It takes a lot of power to turn a large compressor wheel and its the turbine wheel's job to generate this power. Usually on a well designed system you want to keep the ratio between 1. 1 and 1. 3. Anything larger you'll have a hard time driving the compressor wheel.
Another big question is why can't I run a large turbo with a very small turbine housing. The problem with this is that not matter what technology you have on your turbine housing (i. e. VGT, slider) you are always at the mercy of the compressor wheel. If you try to spin the compressor wheel too quickly you push the turbo into surge. This can happen during driving conditions are when you let off on the throttle (i. e. HX40). As boost is directly related to wheel speed your are now sacrificing reliability when you are spinning a 4" passed 100,000 RPM.
You'd be surprised at some of these smaller turbos and how much they can flow from a small wheel. For example our Duramax turbo that should be released in the next couple of months can keep up with a BHT3b. Of course it should as it is a newly designed wheel and the BHT3b was designed in the 1980s. But the big plus is how wide this map is.
Like I said do some reading and research before you buy and remember designing a system is different than assemblying one.