Getting the right vehicle for the right reasons is a major purchasing decision for most of us, and discussion of that was the intent of this post.
Okay,... really... ? Let's look at your original post and play fact or fiction.
I decided that the additional initial outlay and expense of purchasing and maintaining a diesel-powered light truck was not the best option for me at this time. .
You already had made the "addtional initial outlay and expense". Therefore you got quaduplely dinged 1) by paying the additonal expense for the diesel and then deciding not to be happy with it, 2) by purchasing the diesel new, 3) by trading the truck in, instead of selling it outright, and 4) by purchasing another new truck. Fact or fiction.
if you put a pencil to it, the improved mileage from a smoker doesn't pay off unless you intend to keep the rig for at least 100K miles; especially with diesel prices running about 15-20 cents above unleaded.
Again you had already paid the initial expense for the diesel. Prehaps, it would have been wiser for you to evaluate your towing, driving, and how long you planned on keeping the truck BEFORE you made the purchase, then your statement would be credilble. I would hazard to say many, if not most, of the folks here PLAN on keeping their CTD for more than 100K or have purchased the truck with towing/work needs specifically in mind. Apparently, you made a foolish decision. I guess all that we can really say is, thanks for sharing that with us.
I do not believe ANY of the Big 3 have made a realiable diesel transmission yet
I pointed out the reliability of the NV5600 transmission. FACT: the CTD does have a reliable transmission option. You didn't specify any particular kind of transmission and then choose to link to some info on a transmission other than the NV5600. Fact or fiction.
... . Bosch can't get the crud out of the CRD, seems to have about a 12-15% failure rate
I asked you to supply a reference for this failure rate. You still haven't done so. Another member suggested it might have come from a POLL. I pointed out the inherent inaccuracy of that poll. Fact or fiction.
plain-Jane interior came straight out of a 1974 International Scout. Dodge had the best-looking truck on the market, and then turned some frustrated interior designer loose on them
I've seen the interior on Scouts and there are substanial differences. How do you know he was frustrated? Fact or fiction. When you bought Silver you had the option of purchasing a slightly used 2G gasser, a "best-looking truck on the market" instead of the F150.
I don't see much improvement on the steering gear either
There was substantial changes from the 2G to the 3G steering both in "gear" and in beefiness of linkage components. Fact or fiction? Commensurately there have been a lot fewer posts about steering problems in regards to wander, death wobble, and trac bars. The complaints now seem to be focused on bad ball joints that seem to be derived not from design of the steering system, but rather from bad ball joints material quality and lack of grease zerks. This apparently is a very bad DC decision based on the dakota and durango ball joint problems.
Please refer to the sticky about "be civil. "
Besides being factual or fictitious, do you think you choice of wording might be offensive or enflamatory to some folks. If so, why did you choose to do so? Your posts indicate that you are aware of how some folks regard their CTDs. Right or wrong, misguided or not, isn't that their choice. Who appointed you to be moral arbitor of their decisions and passions? Knowing how some folks feel, do you think you could have chosen to select less inflamatory rhetoric and maybe selected better facts. On behalf of TDR, I accept you apologies (TIA). we all wish you happiness with your F150 and hope it meets your individual driving needs.