Here I am

Engine/Transmission (1998.5 - 2002) ATF+4 vs ATF+3

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

Engine/Transmission (1998.5 - 2002) Double Disk Clutches

2nd Gen Non-Engine/Transmission Dual Wheel Conversion Kits

Status
Not open for further replies.
Changed my transmission fluid and filter this weekend. The B&M drain plug is a nice suggestion from the latest magazine. It was easy to install, and will hopefully save me a shower next time around. The filter and gasket kit from Geno's also worked well.

The only hang up in the whole process was the transmission fluid. I have an '01 2500 truck (4-speed auto, hence the posting). The owner's manual specs ATF+4 spec 9602. All I could find at all the local parts stores, Autozone, Advance, Napa, etc. , only had ATF+3 or all the other Dexcron and Mercon specs.

The guy at Autozone said that ATF+3 will work, and since it was the last place I had stopped, and I was getting frustrated, I took him at his word. The truck drives fine, and I haven't noticed any difference in shift quality. Anyone have any insite as to differences and any negative effects of using ATF+3 instead of ATF+4? I figure I'm actually running ATF +3. 5 since I didn't drain the converter...



Thanks,



Justin Blomenberg

2001 Ram 2500
 
Justin, I also have an '01, 2500. I've been using ATF+3 since last spring. +3 is less slippery than +4 and since slipping is a big problem with these trannys and mine was past the 36,000 mile warrenty period, I gave it a try. I've towed my 5th wheel all over Yellowstone last summer and pulled my boat over high passes here in UT with out any problems. I did notice that the shifts are firmer with +3 but everthing I read about auto's says you want firm shifts. I guess time will tell if its doing any damage or not.
 
I remember correctly, +4 was a TSB that came out in 2000 for the '01 trucks. Before that, +3 was what Dodge said to use. In fact, I think my owner's manual says +3 (or is it the service manual?). I think +4 is a semi synthetic, and it used to be that it was only available from Mopar. I'm not sure if you can get it anywhere else even now.
 
Auto stores won't carry ATF+3..... ATF+4 is sold by the dealer. Get ready and bend over $$$$ :{



I know my '99 came with +3 and a TSB says to refill with +4 when changed. I have stuck with the +3 myself. I'm sure the transmission gurus could offer better advice on which one to use on either a stock or modified transmission. My trans is stock and I'm not sure which one to use?
 
My book for my 00 says use +3 and for the last 75k thats all that its seen. I too installed the B&M drain plug last weekend. WHY didn't I do this earlier??? Now I will be more faithfull to dump that fluid. Even if its just what the drainplug gets out, it'd probably help keep it fresh if I do this during engine oil service and change the filter normally. (without paying the dealer to pump it all out, I always just dump the pan)

10 bucks for a few qts of +3? cheap security for me!
 
I get +4 at the dealer, but my dealer is good with pricing. I know I have bought it at the local Murrays Auto. There is one near me who carries several Mopar maintenance items, like filters, etc.



I don't know about the +3 vs +4 and one being more slippery than the other. Across the board, Mopar recommends +4 for everything. Even for the trans kit I got (new clutches/bands/seals) from Mopar Performance for my 1972 Plymouth Roadrunner.
 
I paid $26/gallon for +4 up here in Anchorage (from Lithia Dodge). I do have a modified valve body... I didn't really notice much besides cooler operating temps. Maybe 15-20 degrees less under similar conditions.



-Ben
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top