drrhoades said:
I am assuming that the longer the bar the more suspension travel you can have?
Not necessarily.
Everything that connects to the axle has to have its motion considered in the full range.
For example, the driveshaft has to have a slip yoke or the suspension would bind badly. This is because of the angle of the driveshaft and the fac that the axle is trying to move straight up and down.
The problem with leaf springs is that they do TWO functions. They serve both as the spring, AND as the suspension link.
This is different than a four-link setup, for example, where the function of springing the axle and locating it are separated.
The leaf spring is pretty much the worst overall suspension design, but it's cheap and works. With the live axle leaf spring, the suspension wants to move straight up and down.
But the drive shaft want to force the axle into an arc-shaped motion. Without a slip yoke, this would cause binding.
A ladder bar setup has the same considerations. Since the bar will attach to the frame somewhere and to the axle at some other place, it will NOT allow the axle to travel in a perfectly straight line up and down. in theory, an infinitely long bar would eliminate this (because the axle has a finite range of motion up and down) in much the same way that an integral in calculus is an approximation.
The ultimate setup would be a four-link setup where the locating links were perfectly parallel to the driveshaft throughout the range of travel. This would mean that the locating links and the driveshaft would exactly follow the same arc of travel, and you'd never have bind due to these components.
In fact, such a setup would allow more travel than a typical U-joint can handle.
jh