3.54 v 4.10
Hi All:
I think Roger Rodbolt summed it up best: "... if that won't pull the grade, DOWNSHIFT!!" (Emphasis mine).
I see that all those opposed to the switch drive auto's. I understand why this may be impractical if I had that transmission. To enjoy good fuel economy and decreased transmission temps, the TC must be locked. In an auto, especially towing on the highway, 4. 10's fill the bill perfectly.
In my truck, a great deal of power comes on at 1900 RPM's and seems to gradually dissipate by about 2500. At normal highway speeds, 2500 RPM's in 6th gear is 75 MPH... right where I want to be speedwise but at the very end of my motor's kick in the a$$ feeling RPM-wise. I feel it is unwise to be at the upper end of any parameter in normal driving.
Regarding increasing the tire diameter, I thought of it but don't feel the correction will be enough. This truck is comfortable at 45 MPH (approx. 1500 RPM's) in 6th gear. Available power is excellent, even without any BOMB's, and there's no feeling of lugging either the motor or any driveline component. I simply don't want to be in my highest gear around town. The few percent I will gain from a tire diameter increase is not sufficient to correct this.
As far as driving a 3. 54 before I switch... been there done that. My '95 2500 CTD automatic has a 3. 54 axle; the conclusions for the '01 were reached with experience. Further, I had one of the few '90 CTD's with a 3. 07 rear. Now THAT was a perfect ratio for a non-towing truck. Unfortunately it's no longer available, even directly from Dana.
If the $$$ permit, the switch is a done deal. My only reason for posting was to get a feeling of labor cost. Any thoughts on that?
If anyone knows someone who switched the other way and has a set of 3. 54's on hand, have them email me at: -- email address removed -- TIA