Here I am

Engine/Transmission (1998.5 - 2002) boost psi

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

2nd Gen Non-Engine/Transmission Nv 5600

Status
Not open for further replies.
I assume your talking lift pump pressure? That's about all Your going to see out of the OEM lift pump.
 
Did you use a boost leak detector? WIthout One of them it can be difficult to find a leak. At your pressures I'm thinking you have one.

Are you seeing 0-2 psi at 1800 rpm driving down the road and not just idling the truck up to 1800rpm in neutral? There is a pretty big difference between the two.
 
I used a can of ether if you don't believe me it works make a small entry for it and spray and see what happens I make 24 psi under load it will make 4 psi at 3000 rpm in neutral
 
If it makes 24 psi under hard htrottle there is likely no leak. Low load cruisng 0-2 psi is not unusual. Boost is load dependent so speed and air make a difference.
 
MAP/Boost Sensor is dependant on your altitude

I recently had a MAP/Boost sensor failure. The attachment is for the old failed sensor and new sensor at 3,000 feet. This sensor has a sealed area on one side of an electronic component (strain gauge, potentiometric, capacitive, etc..) and atmosphere on the other side during ohm measurements. Install it would be sealed area on one side of electronic component and intake manifold pressure on the other side.

Cruising at 1800 rpm would be relevant to altitude, load and road levelness. I would consider it normal boost pressure for cruising on a level surface with no load.

Spraying ether on an intake with at idle (very low pressure) would find any leak, but a manifold under pressure it would be rare to find the leak. A manifold under pressure with a back streaming effect can cause the ether to enter at a molecular level (very small).

MAP Boost Sensor Measurements.jpg
 
I would not use ether to find an intake leak,something much less volatile would make more sense and be safer if you feel the need to go that route
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top