I don't use synthetic brake fluid. I do use Castrol LMA. When the stuff was new on the market, LMA stood for Low Moisture Absorbtion. I used it initially because it wouldn't eat the British-made rubber parts on Fiat brakes (don't ask). Castrol LMA comes in DOT 4. Valvoline (I think) sells something that they say is a synthetic base. I have never used it and probably won't until I am I know ow it will mix with LMA or regular fluid.
Silicone based brake fluids reportedly don't absorb any moisture at all. They will not mix with regular brake fluid, and changing over requires flushing. Some idiot had added syunthetic fluid to the brake system of a used Grand Wagoneer I bought. It took some effort to get it all cleaned out. In the presence of regular fluid, the silicone fluid took on the rheological attributes of snot.
I have general reluctance to use brake fluids that don't absorb any moisture because they don't absorb moisture. I know that sounds like a circular objection. Consider that regular brake fluid boils at about 350F. (Remember that plain water boils at 212F. ) As it absorbs water, that boiling point slowly drops. The water seems to work its way to the wheel cylinders. (Maybe it just acts that way. ) Brake fluid with a little water in it is still useful, but really needs to be flushed due to the low boiling point and corrosion potential.
Water will get in through humidity, condensation, and so on. However, if the brake fluid absorbs NO water, the water that gets in can coalesce into a small blob. When that occurs, the effective boiling point of the fluid is 212F. That negates tha very high boiling point of the silicone fluid. Do I have first hand knowledge of this? No. It is what I was told--by several sources--when I was thinking of trying the stuff.
In racing applications, brake bleeding is frequent and regular, and the water blob does not become a problem.
When did you last bleed your brakes? I went close to six years.
