I've no idea about later models, but I've seen nothing to convince me that the regulator in the PCM, or for that matter any ground vehicle voltage regulator is very smart. I think they're actually rather stupid. The one in my '95 is a known failure mode. All they can control is the field current, and all they're interested in is maintaining the system voltage within some particular range. They're not actually programmed to charge the battery, that charging happens is a consequence of pumping enough current into the system to hold the voltage within that range.
Do the voltage drop calcs that I suggested.
http://www.ancorproducts.com/en/resources/three-percent-voltage-drop I think that you'll be surprised at just how much the voltage does drop in a small wire over the length of such a charging circuit (include the ground length too because it matters). Now subtract that voltage drop from an already low output voltage and you're deep in trouble. I didn't do the calcs to justify using 6ga. Doing the calcs lead me to using 6ga. At $6 a foot I wasn't excited to be using 6ga., but to keep the VD under 3% that is what the calcs called for.
I do not agree with everything he says and some of the equipment suggested is now a bit dated, but the turning point for me was reading the Handy Bob blog on solar charging.
https://handybobsolar.wordpress.com/ It got me to thinking about charging system needs regardless of the power source.
Knowing that the regulator in our '95 is a known to fail component I now carry a stand-alone Mopar regulator and the pigtail to connect it should a field repair be necessary, but I recently purchased a much better regulator:
http://shop.pkys.com/Balmar-ARS-5-H-Regulator-12-Volts_p_1734.html It will be interesting to see how the rest of the vehicle behaves with this regulator in place.