No, I did not read very much of it, but I have read dozens, it not hundreds of things over the 30+ years I spent as a trial judge, and the ONE thing you can allways count on is that if you see the other side of the story it will look a whole lot different. That is not to say which side will be correct, but forming an opinnion based on just one"Totally Outrageous " story is not realistic.
I have seen soooooo many examples, many of which you even have a lot of trouble getting the basic truth on;
Such as the major TV News Magazine story about the outrageous and hazardous meat handling practices of a large food chain.
It wasn't till the food chain sued and got the TV people into Fed. Court where the News Magazines records could be discovered that it turned out the food chain "employees" who were doing the terrible stuff were in reality employees of the news magazine, who were sent there to get jobs so they could do these things for the camera. Few people know about this simply because the media people don't tell on each other.
You want to talk about bad people, look at the media. They are allmost totally free to do what they wish because they control the news and they do not squeel on each other.
The Courts will, as will any group, have a few bad apples, but those apples are readily reversed by the higher courts, and on the whole the courts are the cleanest of virtually any group, organization or governmental branch. Don't forget, everything done in a law suit is done "on the record" yes a permanant record is made of everything!. And everything is done under the watchfull eyes of the other side. Every Lawyer knows how to appeal to the appropriate higher court. There have been some underhanded things done, but because of the record and the fact that the otherside has full access, it is very rare, and even more rare for it to be sucessfull in the long run.
When a lawyer claims something underhanded has occurred and gotten away with, it most likely means he/she screwed up badly and is finding a way to excape responsibility; or they are simply misreporting it or twisting the facts to make them look good or look like victims.
In over 30 years on the bench, I witnessed some incompetent, and some goofy judges get elected, or appointed, but they seldom managed to stay long. I never saw a single example that appeared to be dishonest or crooked conduct; but I saw many, many claims of it by someone who lost a case and wanted to claim anything except that they did not have a good case, or they or their lawyer messed up on something crucial.
My appologies for going on so long, guess it rang my bell.
Vaughn