Originally posted by Champane Flight
Every word you guys are putting out sounds like its coming from the Republican handbook. Economics is not that hard to grasp.
<hr></b>
I've told you before. I am not a Republican. I am a constitutionalist. The republican party, like all political parties, has it's basic bent, but also chooses it's positions based upon what it thinks will get it votes and what thinks will work. I have no such restrictions. I merely promote the things gauranteed to work.
<hr><b>
Its you guys that have some utopian ideal that the whole world is based on profits and if big buisness prospers so do we. And you actually believe it. Sure if you had a couple of hundred thousand to plop down Nike stock thirty years ago you could be rich now. How many of the real working stiffs actually had that kind of money thirty years ago?I am living in a real world,I will never be rich,I will never retire,I will work until I die,I don't mind it,and I sure won't sit around the computer and whine about the Democrats and preach a Republican doctrine.
<hr></b>
Not "big" business... ALL business. If business does not prosper and be profitable, NONE OF US WILL. Business writes our paychecks and creates 100% of the wealth that pays the taxes, so if they aren't doing well... not blasted one of us has a snowball's chance in you know where. Unless, of course, you expect to be in some position where you're income is extorted from the misery of those around you... Government employee, labor union, etc. If you disagree with this... explain to me where it comes from, then.
<hr><b>
I have been around hospitals my whole life,they have been whining for the last thrity years(however they are still putting new additions on their buildings and replacing the carpet in the admins offices). While the nurses hold the hospital together. If you have ever worked in a hospital you should know this. The doctors come in and examine,do a procedure,write an order and go home. The nurses have to do the real work. There is a nurse shortage right now. Why? Because nobody wants to work 14 hours and get paid for 12. Because nobody wants to spend 12 to 18 hours on their feet running from room to room. How would you like to be one nurse in charge of up to 45 paitents,this is regular practice in some hospitals. Because nobody wants to put up with doctors with god like manners and shift changes that would make any grown man wince in pain. Because nobody wants to work thirty years as a nurse and get tossed out the door with NO retirement,or disability insurance and crippled up legs and feet,I know several nurses in this situation. Some thank you. Theres some thought and knowledge for you.
<hr></b>
That's a flat-out bunch of lies. No nurse works for 14 and gets paid for 12 - unless they are salary (management... and my wife has been in management), in which case, working conditions for management are often horrible. And there are NO situations where there is one nurse for 45 patients... NONE. The highest ratios are night shifts in psych hospitals, where it may reach 20 to one, but only for a few hours in the middle of the night. And I've never heard of anyone having to work 18 hours straight... well, except when the wife was in management, when she had to do her day job, and then cover for nurses who didn't show... for not a single dime extra... and never got comp time or otherwise.
Frankly, your descriptions bear no resemblance to reality. I have no idea who made up this crap... But that's what it is.
Staffing levels at the striking hospital in Portland are: Psych: 4 patients, 1 nurse. OB, 3 patients or less: 1 nurse. ER: 1:1
CCU: varies, roughly 2:1
And you call that bad? That's roughly twice as good as standard practice in the industry. And they are demanding "Better"???
<hr><b>
I have a problem with people who would take profit over humaninty. Sorry,thats just where I stand. I had my own buisness to and ran it well. It supported itself for five years. I was not out to make a killing just a small profit. It did not fall,I pulled the plug. Tired of working two jobs and 18 hours a day. Now I work 15 a day on a regular basis and seven days a week. I have to go to work today. If it wasn't for the Union I would probably not get paid for it. At least not enough to make a decent living.
<hr></b>
Nonsense. No employer can make you work for free... . Unless, of course, you are management and work for salary. Hourly working stiffs get all the protections.
All I can say, is that if you consider 25 an hour to be crappy pay (what the nurses at the OHSU hospital get, roughly), then you must make a lot more, and based upon your statements, you work 105 hours a week, and at that "crappy pay" you think nurses should strike over, $25 an hour, you gross in excess of $3,400 a WEEK. Carried out over a year, that's $178,000 +
So, if you're really a union member, you get paid by the hour, and with 65 hours of overtime a week, you're really rolling in it.
But, maybe you're not portraying your real situation... Doesn't matter... if you're working for hourly wages, you WILL get overtime and pay for every hour. And no union is needed or required for you to get it.
heck, even if you're making only $12. 50 an hour... that's 1/2 of what you consider pay worth striking over to raise... You make one heck of a lot more than 75% of the people in the country. And that's not "a decent living"?
<hr><b>
If you cross a picket line you should be prepared to take a licking. You are a SCAB,period.
<hr></b>
That's a crime. What gives you the right to commit crime against someone else, who merely disagrees with you? Maybe I have the right to bust you up with a pipe for disagreeing with me? The only thing going on is, is that you don't want to wrok, and someone else does, for your wages. It's nothing more or less than a disagreement. You have no "right" whatsoever to any job on the planet. You don't own anything... your employer does.
But, explain to me why you believe it's ok to commit a crime against someone else for disagreeing with you over what is a fair wage? YOu just said above you did... now I want the justification for it. And it better be good.
<hr><b>
You are out for #1 period. . And you are not only cutting the strikers throat,you are cutting your own. The hospital knew its nurses were threatening strike for the last three months,plenty of time to reroute paitents,or sit down and negoiate. Instead their egos and bottom line takes over and causes this to happen. I have NO pity for the SCABs that cross,as I have NO pity for the hospital. If you look closer I am sure you will find that it is not just about wages. Talk to the strikers,truth lies there.
<hr></b>
Actually, the truth is what I've been telling you.
Not another nurse in the entire state of oregon has the least pity for the strikers. They are the best paid, have the best working conditions, the highest staffing levels, the best benefits in the whole state. They are not "ill used" or otherwise. They just plain greedy. They want thier 30% in two years, even HIGHER staffing levels, plus some other minor stuff, and refuse to budge at all. The hospital started at 6% raise over 2 years, went to 16% over two years, and some of the other things they want, and the union said "nope, we do not negotiate. We get what we want or else". And they are on record in the paper saying so.
What they are asking for is roughly double local pay rates, 3X the staffing levels, and benefits nobody here gets at all. And you say it's not greed? Of course it's greed. Nothing else.
<hr><b>
However eloquent your tirades are PW,they just don't impress me. Maybe you should publish?That way you won't have to sell the farm?