Congress increases its pay despite recession

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

Show-biz Icon Dies...

Anyone here ever toy with a metal detector?

Re: I can see this

Originally posted by Champane Flight

I can see this is going nowhere fast.



My wife went to work as a new grad RN in 1974,she had 45 paitents at one time,by herself,and she was making 5. 05 an hour.

Flat out bunch of lies?A nurse goes on duty for a 12 hour shift,she is instructed to show up early to relieve and get latest changes with paitents. So she comes in one hour early,she spends her 12 hours and her relief gets there she spends another hour doing charts and filling in the relief nurse of changes. When she asks for the extra pay she is usually informed you are scheduled for 12 we pay you twelve!Allot of big hospitals are offering two 18 hour shifts on a weekend for 40 hours of straight pay. This is becoming standard practice to offer this and no benefits to single RNs with kids to take care of during the week.

<hr></b>

That was 26 years ago. New grads now not only do not have the floor to themselves because they canont be "charge nurse", but in no place does anyone have more than about 20 patients per nurse. And that's in places like nursing home and psych wards, where care during the night is mostly just record keeping - and the nursing homes have aids and orderlies to assist.



yes, my wife does report like everyone else. It takes about 10 to 15 minutes, and when she arrives, it's on her time, and at the end of the shift, it's on the clock. I've been there and seen report take less than 5. So don't give me nonsense about 2 hours.



Do you know WHY hospitals offer weekends with 2 18-hour shifts? It's called a shortage. RN's often work 3 12's during the week, and 2 18's on the weekend to "moonlight" when they are single. That still gives them 2 days off a week, and collect 2 full paychecks... Roughly 2400 to 3600 a week! These 18 hour shifts generally don't come with benefits because they are normally filled with part-time people, or moonlighters, or per diem people who just want a little extra money. They generally pay from 20 to 40 an hour, too. This flexibility is what keeps the hospitals and other places staffed at reasonable (and often legally mandated levels) when there simply are not enough RN's to fill all the mandated shifts.



And the hospital does not "owe" single mothers anything for being single mothers. The fact that many of them make amazing accomodations for all sorts of situations is reason enough not to strike.

<hr><b>



I do not get 105 hrs a week,its every two weeks... . I am no longer Union,however everything I am now making was fought for and won by Unions... ... Try to support a family on 12. 50 an hour... . Any employer (around here at least)can and has told employees that there is no OT paid at there position and make them take comp time or tell them "If they don't like it theres the road". In my mind this is at the root of the downfall of America. If it takes both parents working two jobs apeice to support a family on paltry wages,what are the kids doing?They are raising themselves!



<hr></b>



I merely took your words... you said: 15 hours a day, 7 days a week. I see it was really more like 10 hours a day, 5 days a week. But, whatever.



It is both federal and state law that overtime occurs for hourly paid people over 40 hours a week. Some situations allow "averaging" over a month. No employer can do that. If people choose to accept failing to get thier overtime, they choose to do so. All it requires is filing a claim with your state authorities and you WILL be paid, along with penalties, as well.



There's a reason it takes 2 incomes to raise a family. In 1950, the average person paid less than 4% of his income to the federal government... income AND SS taxes combined. And state and local rarely brought the total to even 10% of your income - including property, sales, and income taxes.



Presently, the cost of taxes and government mandates that's built into the cost of everything we do, from our houses to our cars, to food to education and everything in between is roughly 50% of your gross earnings. I'm not just talking about federal income taxes. I'm talking about income, SS (16%), property, and other state and local taxes, plus the cost added to our cars, gas, food, energy, phone, home, health care, and pretty much everything else you must do or have to live.



For instance, here in Oregon, it is impossible to provide daycare for less than roughly $4 an hour per child. This is becuase our state "gave" us "quality" child care. Daycare workers now must have either a college degree, or go to college level classes for 6 months and hold a state "certification". And, you must maintain a ratio of children to certified providers mandatd by the state. At present wage scales for people with the degree or "educators certificate", the wages for them alone average more than $3 an hour. Then you need a facility, food, and other overhead costs. None of this has altered statistics on daycare problems in the state, but it has roughly doubled the cost of daycare. Again, another example of how runaway government costs you an arm and a leg while pretending to "protect" people.



<hr><b>



As far as "cutting your own throat",you are giving a employer a reason to continue to rip off its employees. When someone is on strike,it is not because they are happy campers. And contrary to what some believe it is not always about wages,or greed.



<hr></b>



My wife would be immensely grateful to be "ripped off" at the wages and benefits the strikers are turning down. So would every other RN in the valley and for that matter, most of the state. But hey, when you think you're God and the world owes you riches, you'll strike for anything, no?



So, what do YOUR family members make an hour as RN's?



<hr><b>





"From the misery of those around me"Maybe you can explain that comment to me. It is plain to see you have never worked in the trenches. I work with highly flammable materials everyday at work. If one valve is not operated in the proper sequence BOOM,we just lost half a city. Not to mention someone would not have fuel for there cars,trucks,and homes. I guess I don't deserve a decent wage?



<hr></b>

I what? Over the course of my lifetime, I've been a janitor for minimum wage. Worked in a machine shop building magnesium parts for same. Worked in a laundry in a nursing home... for same. Delivered Pizza for same. I worked as a logger as a teenager with my dad in Montana. Skidded logs with a cat, fell trees, ran the peeler machine, and loaded the truck... For $. 04 a fencepost.



I was a pump shop mechanic for nearly 14 years. I started for a little over min wage and my last hourly paycheck was at $12 an hour a few years ago. Then I switched to pay by piecework. It was my request as well.



I started my own business as an ISP in a small town and went broke.



Yeah, been there, done it, got the T-shirt. Been unemployed, employed, well off, not well off.



<hr><b>



I guess these nurses and every nurse out there that have human lives in there hands everyday don't deserve a decent wage?



<hr></b>



If an RN is working for bad pay, it's easy enough to get a very good paying job. In fact, they go begging every day. In case you didn't know it, wages for RN's have nearly doubled in 5 years, and the trend is upward faster than it has been, due to some areas being unable to staff thier places at ANY wage.

<hr><b>



I suppose that if someone steals the food from your childrens mouths and the cloths from your back,you have no right to be angry?That is what a SCAB is doing..... He is stealing... ... I have a right to bust a thief. It is not JUST a disagreement.



<hr></b>

Pure hogwash. If you don't want to work, and you sit idly by, depriving yourself of your income, then that's your own stupid fault. If someone else is willing to work, then by all means, they get the job. That's all there is to it. Nobody's "stealing" anything.



You are free to leave your position and try to find something better. That's called freedom. Excercise it, or can it. But in no way do you have any right to deprive someone else of what you don't want.

<hr><b>



As you have said before you have made a choice of what side of the street you want to stand and if you are being abused as Managment,you made that choice. I don't understand your logic,in one hand they are being abused,but are afraid to stand up for themselves?Yes Boss,I is here for you Boss... .



With all the ranting about the mean greenies taking farmland from the Kalamath farmers(which was stolen from the indians). I thought you had a farm?



I live in a farmland community... and the greens are targeting my area... probably next. My well-being depends upon the farmers having property rights, water, and other legal expectations.



And please ,don't give me that total BS about the Klamath Basin being stolen from the Indians. That's a political dogma... and not worth the bytes stolen to write it.
 
Imperial Congress

It seems that those that control the $$$, also controls the amount of money anyone gets. The more control (power / position) the more money they can give themself. During layoffs have you ever seen a Manager, Director, V. President take a paycut or did they just layoff / fire 1, 2, 3, so they would meet buget and theur bonus.



The Imperial Congress has taken the gutless approach they get $5,000. 00 and they then give the retired folks 50. 00 maybe.



I ask everyone to write their member of the Imperial Congress "Refuse (vote down) the pay raise ". And then tie their raise to everyone else, Social Security, military retired, etc. They are already over paid and we the people should have the abilty to vote their pay up or down.



Give the people the pay vote as a vote of confidence for every member of congress. Then see what they are worth.



JMHO
 
Originally posted by Don M





I could use it as well in some lubricant related topics.



Could I borrow that from time to time?



Don~



If yer using it to argue with MGM about Amsoil, go for it!!!



:D :D :D



:sigh... you know, sometimes it seems like we miss the forest for the trees. . Of course, soon we won't be allowed into the forest at all...
 
One at a time

Lets see if I can address one at a time for you.



In talking to my son who is a nurse who works for the state prison system I have been told he has about 25 paitents at one time at average. He has had a high of fifty. This is mostly psych.

He also averages 30-35 dollars an hour. He has been in the system for the last 18 years.



My daughter inlaw who works in a major hospital in Denver is making around 25 to 30 an hour and tells me she works aprox 1. 5 to 2. 0 hours extra every day. This is because of paitent overload and high turnover of paitents.



Have you ever went to EEOC and tryed to file a claim against a employer for violation of said labor laws?It took one year to even get the employer to come in to talk to EEOC agent!Then the claim netted the employee who was wronged a grand total of 1500. 00 for 8 months of lost wages!this took a total of almost two years to get!That is what our federal and state laws are all about. This was a serious violation of disability act!I know this to be truth it was me who experienced it. I worked a minimum wage job while I was waiting. And watched my savings dwindle.



It seems to me that the nurses up there are just coming into line with the rest of the big city nurses. Now the nurses in a small hospital would think that this is big money. Our local nurses(a town of 6000 people) make 12-19 dollars an hour. The 19 is given to the "clipboard nurses".



When you or anyone else is under contract and votes to strike,he is making a desicion to fight for what he feels is a fair wage,benefit,or working condition. At a good negotiation both partys step out thinking they got screwed. If an employer feels he can break said contract,then let him take the heat.



I tend to disagree with your analogy of why it takes two parents working full time to make it. My take on this is that we as a nation have lost our ability to be a manufacturing based country. These jobs were higher wage union jobs,they are now gone. And in there place we all can work for Mcdonalds for 6. 00 an hour. Or take the jobs away from people trying to fight for what seems like a million bucks an hour!These people are just trying to make enough to overcome the outrageous tax base you have explained. Give em a break...
 
Although I would imagine most of us here are relatively in the same economic class, most of what I read was basically class warfare type of argument. The biggest problems caused by the labor unions is their support of the various political candidates.

Those candidates become members of the various branches of government and make laws contrary to the welfare of the worker paying the dues that go to support their campaign.

A few years back I paid 118,000 dollars for a 24,000 dollar house. I'm told my house is now worth 160,000 dollars. I'm employed in a union job and could probably barely qualify for a loan to buy the house I'm currently paying for.

High salaries in non union/white collar positions are owing to the union wage scale. If union scale was not as high as it is neither would management salary.

Business' move their factories out of the U. S. not because of high union wages or work rules, but because the laws being passed by the legislator being paid by the union worker who has no say in how his dues are spent, etc. etc. etc.

Have none of you read the piece PW just put up re. the Klamath Falls debacle in Oregon?

This stirring up the pot going on in here is really beside the point.

And what is all this about "If you don't vote you got no complaint" WTF?

Every time there is an election a group of people get up on stage, drop their drawers, bend over and moon the voters, and we are supposed to choose which A** hole we want to represent us. Gimme a break.

Look, didn't Klinton get elected... TWICE? And now that the great GW is running things, has the rape in Klamath stopped? Have the perps in the Waco murders at Mt Zion been brought to justice?

You vote for who you want, things are not going to change. This griping union or no is only a diversion.



Be ready when Jesus returns.



Jay
 
Last edited:
Just be thankful you don't get all the goverment you pay for - W.C. Fields

"Congressional Retirement"



Our Senators/Congressmen do not pay into Social Security, and, therefore they do not collect from it. Social Security benefits were not suitable for them. They felt they should have a special plan.



Many years ago they voted in their benefit plan. In more recent years, no congress person has felt the need to change it. After all, it is a great plan. For all practical purposes, their plan works like this:



When they retire no matter how long they have been in office, they continue to draw their same pay until they die, except it may be increased from time to time by the cost-of-living adjustments. For example, former Senator Bill Bradley (New Jersey) and his wife may be expected to draw $7,900,000. 00 over an average life span, with Mrs. Bradley drawing $275,000. 00 during the last year of her life. Their cost for this excellent plan is "0," nada, zilch. This little perk they voted in for themselves is free to them. You and I pick up the tab for this plan. Our tax dollars at work!



Social Security, which you and I pay into every payday for our own retirement, with an equal amount matched by our employer, we can expect to get an average of $1,000 per month. Or, we would have to collect our benefits for 68 years and 1 month to equal the Bradley's benefits.



Imagine for a moment that you could structure a retirement plan so desirable, a retirement plan that worked so well, that Railroad Employees, Postal Workers, and others who were not in the plan would clamor to be included.



This is how good Social Security could be, if only one small change was made. That change would be to jerk the Golden Fleece Retirement Plan out from under the senators/ Congressmen. Put them into the Social Security plan with the rest of us. Watch how fast they fix it!!! If enough people receive this maybe a seed will be planted, and maybe good changes will evolve.



Don't forget, our girl, Hillary Rodham Clinton, thanks to the infinite wisdom of New York State voters, now comes under this Congressional Retirement Plan. Talking about the Clintons, it's common knowledge that, in order for her to establish NY residency, they purchased a million+ house in upscale Chappaqua, NY.



Makes sense. Now, they are entitled to Secret Service protection for life. Still makes sense. Here is where it becomes interesting!! A residency had to be built in order to house the Secret Service agents. The Clinton's now charge the Secret Service rent for the use of said residence and that rent is just about equal to their mortgage payment, meaning that we, the tax payers, are paying the Clinton's mortgage and it's all perfectly legal. You gotta luv it. Is Everybody Happy ?????????
 
Re: Just be thankful you don't get all the goverment you pay for - W.C. Fields

Originally posted by dodger22

"Congressional Retirement"





This is how good Social Security could be, if only one small change was made. That change would be to jerk the Golden Fleece Retirement Plan out from under the senators/ Congressmen. Put them into the Social Security plan with the rest of us. Watch how fast they fix it!!! If enough people receive this maybe a seed will be planted, and maybe good changes will evolve.






I must disagree with you on this. There is no fix for social security... It cannot be repaired. It is fundamentally and fatally flawed. It is not possible to fund 5, 10, 15, or even 20 years of retirement by transferring money from the workers to the non-workers. It is too expensive. In 40 years, the cost of SS will be equal to half of our gross paychecks. And that doesn't include medicare, income taxes, or anything else. If nothing is fundamentally altered, government will consume more than 100% of our earnings in less than 50 years.



The fundamental flaw here, is that it is impossible to create a national retirement system that supports long-term retirement with transfer payments. I say "long term" because when SS was concieved, somewhere around 10% of Americans ac tually lived long enough to collect any, and those who did rarely collected more than 2 years. We are now funding people for more than 2 decades, and that's why stealing from the working, and giving to the non-working is a dead-end



The ONLY cure for retirement is investment. Basically, each person needs to put away his/her own money in investment vehicles that grow. IRA's which are owned by the individual are the only feasible solution.



If we started off by elimenating social security for every person born starting Jan 1, 2002, and maintaining the benefits for those now living under the system, and everyone entering starts a private plan, our children will be able to retire before they die. But if we maintain our determination to keep the "retirment by theft" system we have now, there is no hope. If we're going to maintain any solvency at all, the retirement ages will shortly be well over 80, and the "benefit" will be so small as to be starvation. All the last 40 years of borrowing and "notes" the government has floated which "pay interest" to the social security system are now coming due and will be, and since 100% of it has to come from the taxpayers, we're now stuck... Fewer and fewer of our tax dollars pay benefits, and more and more are now dedicated to "redeeming" notes from one part of government to another.



It's as if you had two checking accounts, and when one runs out of money, you "borrow" from the other "with interest". Of course, when it comes time to pay it back, you realize that the "investment" the lending account did merely costs you both the "loan" and the "interest" as well. Such is what SS and the treasury have been doing for decades. "borrowing" money from SS to spend. Now we have to "pay" it back. But since we fund ALL government spending, the accounting tricks are nothing more than a fraud on the people.



But hey, since nobody actually bothers to explain this to the public, the Democrats demogogue endlessly, screaming about how "the other party" wants to starve old people and take away thier SS. Of course, thier actions are gauranteed to bring about this result, but since when did results matter? ONly what you can make the gullible believe.
 
Back
Top