Might want to get some more significant firearms training. So your a mall cop in some po dunk city in mid west WONT SAY BECAUSE the big case was the candy bar theft ring :-laf
What???? I really struggle to comprehend your train of thought. Can someone decipher this please?
Linneweber told the reporter, though, that to legally shoot a dog, the law does not require that the threat be imminent. For that reason, and others, he declined to prosecute the Gee case and suggested that the Saarels could pursue civil action. Another section of Montana law addresses killing dogs that harass, destroy, or injure livestock. That section states that a dog which “harasses, kills, wounds, or injures livestock not belonging to the owner of the dog is considered a public nuisance and…may be killed immediately by the owner of the livestock or an agent or employee of the owner... ”
This section of law defines livestock harassment as that which “worries, chases, or runs after livestock…in a manner that may lead to subsequent injury to the livestock. ” Continuing, the law states that “the owner of the dog, when reasonably notified after due process, shall kill the dog within 24 hours of notification. If the owner fails to do so, an officer may be notified and shall kill the dog or cause the dog to be killed. ” The law requires that “a dog may not be killed in a manner that will endanger a person. ” So ya you were rite the guy was an A** for doing it where it was done.
A pleasure horse is livestock? I still call it BS. It sounds like a scene from a 1940's Western. The mean ******* of a bad guy rides into town and shoots the child's dog to death. Only, in the movie, the child eventually grows up and tracks down the mean *******, and shoots him down like the dog he took out.
GulDam