Then to add more insult to Ram...The 2500 is the lowest selling vehicle right now, huge inventories.
https://caredge.com/guides/new-car-inventory-most-and-least
The internet is killing the Ram 2500 right now with its class low GVWR of 10K lbs. Any forum/group/etc is pushing GVWR/payload as a legally binding number everywhere and that really hurts the 10K Ram with a 6.7.
Ram is the only 3/4 ton without a 11K+ GVWR. It’s time for a change.
Could it be that "#67A 2013-2018 D TRUCK ENGINE CALIBRATION" notices many of us have been getting? Showed up in my CarFax dashboard.So which recall is tied to this?
Could it be that "#67A 2013-2018 D TRUCK ENGINE CALIBRATION" notices many of us have been getting? Showed up in my CarFax dashboard.
The article was specific to 19+ motors.
This was the paragraph that led me to believe it was 13+:The article was specific to 19+ motors.
This was the paragraph that led me to believe it was 13+:
"The department said Cummins used defeat devices on 630,000 2013 to 2019 RAM 2500 and 3500 pickup truck engines and undisclosed auxiliary emission control devices on 330,000 2019 to 2023 RAM 2500 and 3500 pickup truck engines to cheat emissions control requirements."
I have to get my 18 smogged every year and it passes with almost zeros in each measure. So what's the "defeat"?
Could be the same "defeat" that Volkswagen did - wrote software to pass emission testing when being tested, then wen back to not passing emissions when being driven.
- John
No definitely not!
The problem is the definition of a "defeat device" - the article doesn't say what it was.
Read into it, some of these "defeats" keep the system from destroying itself under certain conditions.
There must be a new definition of Defeat from EPA, I'm dead sure that Cummins did not cheat the way we define cheat. Especially not on a new engine generation 2019+.
Can someone find out what actually the problem was????