Here I am

D-Max power level up

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

bd twins

Checking in...

Status
Not open for further replies.
They may have beefed up the Allison for this next generation. They added a gear and I would hope they made the internals strong enough to avoid the previous de-fueling in first and fifth gears. Hard to say though, it is rare these days that the beancounters will allow the engineers to spend enough to do things right.



The D-max is such a great engine that GM hides the actual manufaturer behind the duramax logo. I don't see Ford advertising Navistar as thier supplier either. The only truck on the road with enough cajones to pronounce its roots with a badge on the truck, the big C, Cummins. Cummins and DC have a contract to supply the engines. I don't know how long the current agreement is but you will never see both Ford and Dodge with a big C in a light truck at the same time.
 
If and whenever Ford actually gets the contract for the Cummins, it will not be a rumor floating around. Expect to see the announcement on Fox, CNN, etc.
 
Oh, Here we go again. Ford owns Cummins and they are going to start putting it in the F250 & F350.

Let me guess the next thing will be a Mercedes diesel engine in a Dodge truck. :-laf



The next thing people will be saying is Elvis is still alive. He actually was until he saw today's gas prices. :--)
 
Per Diesel Power mag. Vol. 1 No. 1 page 88 : " The Duramax was engineered jointly by

Isuzu and GM's Powertrain Division and is manufactured at General Motors' Moraine, Ohio plant. " So does that mean GM makes the Duramax?
 
JonathanBurk said:
Most miss the key point here though...



Ford & Chevy have to use 8-cylinders just to get anywhere near the Cummins I6. So to me it ain't a threat until they start pumping out at least 25% more than the Dodge. 650 lbs? What's that... 8%?



They're still a long way off from making any kind of huge breakthrough. :)



Don't take that for a bashing either, my Uncle has a 7. 3L & my friend a 6. 6L Duramax. Very nice trucks and I am in no way saying they are inferior... just stating a fact that they may make a lot of power, but they're 25% bigger engines.



And based off of my uncle's, getting 25% worse mileage.



Not sure where you are getting your logic, but 6. 6 divided by 5. 9 is 12% larger, not 25%. My Dmax dually gets better mileage than my 05 6 speed cummins too, so again, not sure where you are getting your information. Both the dmax and Cummins are great motors, and the dmaxs are really making some power now.
 
BHolm said:
They may have beefed up the Allison for this next generation. They added a gear and I would hope they made the internals strong enough to avoid the previous de-fueling in first and fifth gears. Hard to say though, it is rare these days that the beancounters will allow the engineers to spend enough to do things right.



The D-max is such a great engine that GM hides the actual manufaturer behind the duramax logo. I don't see Ford advertising Navistar as thier supplier either. The only truck on the road with enough cajones to pronounce its roots with a badge on the truck, the big C, Cummins. Cummins and DC have a contract to supply the engines. I don't know how long the current agreement is but you will never see both Ford and Dodge with a big C in a light truck at the same time.



This is not correct.



The 6 speed Allison is exactly the same trans as the 5 speed, the only difference is some internal valve body mods that allow one more gear by changing the lock up of several of the planetaries. Some guess that existing 5 speeds may be able to also get the 6th gear with some mods.



For the umpteenth time, Dmaxs do NOT defuel in First and Fifth! Read the factory service manual, and you will see that this is not correct. This is an unfounded rumor which many at TDR keep passing. The torque management is only in 4 low.

The dmax is a joint venture between Isuzu and GM, so yes in fact GM is one of the producers of this motor.
 
hasslebach,



Yes, I corrected myself in one of the posts above. Had a brain fart and was comparing 8-cyl vs. 6-cyl... = 25% difference. Didn't even think about displacement which is the more accurate factor. :)



As for mileage I was under the impression the Cummins (at least when in the 2nd gens) was getting much better mileage than the PS & DM of the time. Doesn't look like that's the case though. . especially now.



I'm still learnin. :)
 
Parks said:
Oh, Here we go again. Ford owns Cummins and they are going to start putting it in the F250 & F350.

Let me guess the next thing will be a Mercedes diesel engine in a Dodge truck. :-laf



QUOTE]



Its true- I just pulled the fatc off another site,

QUOTE:

"i have drivena cummins and the d-max, bone stock, the cummins didn`t impress me much, or not any more than the ford 7. 3 or the 6. 0. the d-max was the most impressive of all. now when you go cranking them up the way you diesel pullers do, the cummins has the trophy there. but the d-max sure looks like it is coming on very strong. i work for daimler-chrysler,so i just hpoe you dodge guys aren`t too disappointed when the cummins goes bye-bye. the mercedes diesel is supposed to be "compareable" to the cummins though. we will see.



the mercedes is going to happen,you will just have to trust me. i can`t reviel the part number for the engine,because of work. i have seen the blue prints. it was supposed to happen a while ago, but the old chassis wouldn`t accept the new engine,so they bought another four year contract with cummins. the mercedes is making around 300 hp. that is about all i know. "

-----------------------------------------------------------------------



There you go, bonafide FACT. :-laf
 
Its true- I just pulled the fatc off another site,
QUOTE:
"i have drivena cummins and the d-max, bone stock, the cummins didn`t impress me much, or not any more than the ford 7. 3 or the 6. 0. the d-max was the most impressive of all. now when you go cranking them up the way you diesel pullers do, the cummins has the trophy there. but the d-max sure looks like it is coming on very strong. i work for daimler-chrysler,so i just hpoe you dodge guys aren`t too disappointed when the cummins goes bye-bye. the mercedes diesel is supposed to be "compareable" to the cummins though. we will see.

the mercedes is going to happen,you will just have to trust me. i can`t reviel the part number for the engine,because of work. i have seen the blue prints. it was supposed to happen a while ago, but the old chassis wouldn`t accept the new engine,so they bought another four year contract with cummins. the mercedes is making around 300 hp. that is about all i know. "
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

There you go, bonafide FACT. :-laf[/QUOTE]

Well I'm glad I got my Cummins!
 
Funny debate, keeps going and going. All three ps (when they run), D-max, and CTD are better than any gasser period (IMHO).



As to whose engines will be in which trucks, time will tell. Lets not forget the EPA emissions standards, they will have a huge effect on which company's engines show up in light duty trucks.
 
So beings were talking about the future, I have heard from about three different people that Ford is going to have a 6. 4L cummins V8 for 07 or 08 and that it is 500 horse stock, and yes im serious, this is what the ford lovers are saying. Anyone know any truth or info proving this is BS, cuz i tell them all its bs and they all say ford owns cummins too. I just say i will believe it when i see it... .
 
Impressive

When I top Old Fort mountain on I-40 east of Asheville, NC with TQ locked doing 55-60mph with my 36' Cedar Creek with every Ford and Chevy behind me...



I am damned impressed... Oo.
 
Hercules130 said:



I moved from a Dmax to my current Cummins powered Dodge to get away from the new V8 madness going on between GM and Ford. I think the packaging, along with the strive for power, the eleventh hour incorporation of emissions controls is just destroying the reason for having a diesel in the first place.



Simplicity, minimum emissions control hardware and the beauty of a real workhorse diesel got me to switch to Cummins



To answer the question about who makes the Dmax... it was 99% designed by Izuzu in Japan. The plant in Moraine, OH is technically run by Japanese engineers. GM recently bought out the Isuzu stake in Dmax, LTD but all that does is change the financials.



The Duramax has been redesigned three times in five years to incorporate emissions controls and supposedly improve servicability. This latest redesign they had to beef up the block because it was shown to crack in durability testing. I like the way it runs. The power is smooth. I don't like what it is. A high revving smog engine with too much junk on it. The second redesign added cooled egr which seemed to have created an overheating problem. GM had to address it with a TSB. I read where some people were getting stranded. Engines were getting destroyed. The third redesign specifically identified cooling system improvements. I had lot's of issues with my 2001 including defueling shutdowns on the highway I could never get fixed and a blown headgasket.



The Duramax has been one big diesel in beta form in the middle of redesign throughout it's five year life.



Yea the Cummins has it's share of changes but it's still a cast iron block/head medium duty inline six that has all the attributes of a true workhorse diesel. It's still relatively simple in design. No cooled egr. Tons of room under the hood. Reliable as all heck and has a history Ford and GM can't touch.



International(Ford) and GM(Isuzu) are in some kind of crazy hp war without regards to what a diesel is supposed to be. They are in a marketing craze that literally almost destroyed the Powerstroke. The Dmax was a good thing for GM considering what they had for diesels in the past. The engine is a technicians nightmare more so with the latest redesign. It's friggin got glow plugs still to control startup emissions, not neccessarily to aid cold start. It also has in intake grid heater that get this, has been redisigned from last year to use the same design as the Cummins has been using for years. I hear they are having issues with glow plugs melting now. I also heard they are having a devil of a problem getting it to be 2007 compliant.



The Allison is a beauty but it's not really as heavy of a trans as we all thought it would be way back when it first was announced. Believe me I know. I used to put mine in limp mode at will with not much extra power. You want to load up an Allison you need to put the same kind of money in it as you do the competition. Now, with six speeds, does that make it a good drag transmission? No think so. All that shifting ain't the way to go. It is a GREAT stock transmission though.



The new International 6. 4 twin turbo is a scary prospect considering what they produced last time around. Again we are looking at an emissions V8 with tiny twin turbos. Little screamers designed to reduce emissions at low rpms. That one will be interesting to watch. Hopefully it will be reliable for Ford and International's sake. It's sure to be a technicians nightmare though.



Finally, what the heck happened to the fuel economy advantage with diesels. All three have come down in mpg and up in power. With the price of diesel today it's becoming harder and harder to justify owning a high power diesel in a pickup truck with the initial cost now in the $5000 plus range and fuel at $2. 80- $3 a gallon.



I guess the commercial haulers don't have as much of an issue with it as they are now passing the cost over to the customers with surcharges but us regular users get hammered.



I'm in my second year as a first time Cummins owner after being GM diesel for the prior 10 years or so. I feel good. This truck has been great to me so far.



MACKIN smack daddy chew on that. :-laf This post would get me banned on thedieselplace
 
Last edited:
hasselbach said:
My Dmax dually gets better mileage than my 05 6 speed cummins too, so again, not sure where you are getting your information. Both the dmax and Cummins are great motors, and the dmaxs are really making some power now.





not really a fare comparison the lb7's get good mileage the the lly dont do as well, your 05 dodge met the 04 epa regs and your lb7 d-max did not. the 305/555 cummins get better mileage the the 325/600 or 610 engines but again do not meet the epa regulations.

we will wait to see how the lbz does for fuel.

-robert
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top