I, also, have heard that the advertising cost is a legitimate cost that needs to be passed on to the customer.
The thing I don't understand is that I can't think of anything I purchase that the seller adds "advertising costs" on the invoice as an additional charge. Advertising costs are always included in the cost of the product that we purchase. When I owned my business, I was never able to add an additional charge for advertising, or anything else, for that matter. My customers would have revolted had I tried anything that sneaky to make an extra profit. My charges were up front and had to include everything. Occasionally, I would have an across the board price increase to cover the additional expenses I had incurred manufacturing the product the customers were buying. Basically, passing-on to the customer the extra expense involved in manufacturing the product. My cost increases were still governed by competition.
Have any of you had to pay additional costs for advertising for anything you have purchased, in the past? Other than vehicles, of course.
I was at a Mitsubishi dealer, yesterday, and they have a car sith a wing on the back called an "Evolution", I believe. They had an extra charge called "Added Market Value" which, was basically $4,990. 00 additional profit to the dealer. Plus, they had added "exterior and interior protection packages" which, carried a huge cost. These extra charges added $8,000. 00 to the cost of the car.
For that matter, when I bought my '03 Dodge, one of the dealers here in Phoenix had an additional "Added Market Value" charge of $3,990. 00. They "double-teamed" the customer with two salesmen chasing you around the lot. I told them there was no way that I would pay a penny of that charge and they immediately agreed to drop it. I asked them why they do that and they said that you would be surprised how many people are so intimidated by the car buying process and just pay whatever the invoice says. I didn't buy from that dealer!
Joe F. (Buffalo)