Engine has approximately 380,000 miles and oil analysis has been performed during the entire time frame, since the engine was new. With acetone in use, and less apparent smoke (apparently cleaner combustion), the percent soot level in the used oil did drop by . 1% - which means less potential wear on the engine components and less potential degradation on the engine oil additive package. All other engine oil analysis parameters remained unchanged within analytical accuracy.
With respect to 'drying out the cylinder walls' - this is somewhat of an old diesel engine myth. Older, very slow speed marine diesels burned heavy Bunker C or #6 oil and they were in fact designed to have a wetting of the upper cyclinder by the fuel. These were very slow speed engines (75 to 250 RPM with massive bore and stroke). Some older Detroit 2 cycle diesel were also designed to have the upper cylinder wetted by the fuel.
As a general rule, diesel engines designed and put into service over the past 20 years try to avoid wetting the upper cylinder wall with the fuel for the following reasons:
1) Fuel contacting the cylinder wall will cool the cylinder (and therefore the cylinder volume) and reduce thermal combustion efficiency.
2) Fuel contacting the cylinder wall will oxidize / turn carbonaceous and is subsequently not available for combustion. The carbonaceous material will act as an abrasive agent on the upper piston ring and the cylinder wall.
3) Diesel fuel, in this type of environment is not a good lubricant.
Therefore, if the acetone increases combustion efficiency by changing surface tension between the fuel molecules / oxygen, etc. then the probability of diesel fuel contacting the upper cylinder wall is decreased and the acetone is a benefit, not a headache.
Gasoline engines with 300,000 miles of acetone use have been disassembled and upper cylinder wall wear was 'miked' out at . 004".