"Moderator- I don’t want to turn this topic into a political statement
Then why DID you?
but something has to be said.
I personally think that the price of fuel will stay high and climb higher all summer long. Mr. Bush has to pay for his war someway. Also Bush, Cheney, Halliburton (sp?) and their other oil cohorts will in the meantime make BILLIONS. Then in Sept or Oct the price will suddenly drop a FEW cents/gal to ensure Bush’s re-election. That way we are supposed to think that we are getting a “GOOD” deal! However the price after the election will still be considerably higher than it was last winter/spring. Get accustomed to it! It fells so good to get SHAFTED!
I may be wrong but that is the way that I see it!"
1. Any observant driver KNOWS from long experience that fuel prices typically rise thru the summer months, and then retreat in the fall - why has it just now become a "Bush conspiracy"?
2. Are you REALLY saying that rising fuel prices are intended to somehow "pay for the war"? SHEESH!
3. Are you saying that all we need do is "vote for the other guy" if we really want to see permanent, significant reduction in fuel costs?
Has it not occured to you that we just MIGHT now be paying for a decades long failure to establish a national energy policy - one that assures reasonable isolation against manipulation from foreign interests - and that the failure is NOT one "owned" by the Republicans or conservatives - but pretty much equally shared by ALL our political "representatives"?
Has it not ALSO occured to you, and those like you, that as long as we out here in society attempt to choose sides and fight against EACH OTHER over which party is "to blame", the status quo will not soon change?
This is NOT a "political issue" in the sense that one party is to blame, while the other is pure as driven snow - they all share equally for where we now find ourselves - and to suggest otherwise is short-sighted and foolish!
It also prevents us from focusing on the REAL issue, which is a meaningful domestic energy policy that isolates us from foreign manipulation, provides research and development of alternative fuel sources, and development of energy-efficient transportation as well as other energy dependent items...
And THAT is a non- partisan, high priority need - otherwise, we will continue to fight "energy wars" - regardless of WHO is in office, until all oil is depleted, and we return to burning our meat over campfires!
Then why DID you?
but something has to be said.
I personally think that the price of fuel will stay high and climb higher all summer long. Mr. Bush has to pay for his war someway. Also Bush, Cheney, Halliburton (sp?) and their other oil cohorts will in the meantime make BILLIONS. Then in Sept or Oct the price will suddenly drop a FEW cents/gal to ensure Bush’s re-election. That way we are supposed to think that we are getting a “GOOD” deal! However the price after the election will still be considerably higher than it was last winter/spring. Get accustomed to it! It fells so good to get SHAFTED!
I may be wrong but that is the way that I see it!"
1. Any observant driver KNOWS from long experience that fuel prices typically rise thru the summer months, and then retreat in the fall - why has it just now become a "Bush conspiracy"?
2. Are you REALLY saying that rising fuel prices are intended to somehow "pay for the war"? SHEESH!
3. Are you saying that all we need do is "vote for the other guy" if we really want to see permanent, significant reduction in fuel costs?
Has it not occured to you that we just MIGHT now be paying for a decades long failure to establish a national energy policy - one that assures reasonable isolation against manipulation from foreign interests - and that the failure is NOT one "owned" by the Republicans or conservatives - but pretty much equally shared by ALL our political "representatives"?
Has it not ALSO occured to you, and those like you, that as long as we out here in society attempt to choose sides and fight against EACH OTHER over which party is "to blame", the status quo will not soon change?
This is NOT a "political issue" in the sense that one party is to blame, while the other is pure as driven snow - they all share equally for where we now find ourselves - and to suggest otherwise is short-sighted and foolish!
It also prevents us from focusing on the REAL issue, which is a meaningful domestic energy policy that isolates us from foreign manipulation, provides research and development of alternative fuel sources, and development of energy-efficient transportation as well as other energy dependent items...
And THAT is a non- partisan, high priority need - otherwise, we will continue to fight "energy wars" - regardless of WHO is in office, until all oil is depleted, and we return to burning our meat over campfires!
Last edited: