Here I am

Engine/Transmission (1998.5 - 2002) Dropping Fuel Mileage

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

2nd Gen Non-Engine/Transmission ABS(Anti Lock Brakes) light blinking?

Engine/Transmission (1998.5 - 2002) fuel pressure

Status
Not open for further replies.
What all do I need to start looking at to find out where my fuel mileage is going?



In the last 6 months I have watched my mileage go from the 18's in the city to my last fill up at 13. 6. and 20's on the highway down to the 16's.



I have had 2 count em, 2, LP's replaced and the VP44 in the last 4 months (under warranty:D). The first LP dropped my mileage about 1. 5 mpg. This is the first fill up since the VP44, and I dropped another 1 mpg.



I keep my tire pressures at 55 front and 45 rear. The tires are Futura Dakotas 235/75 (fairly aggressive, put on in October).



I pulled the front tires and the brake calipers to make sure that they were not seized. The left side pads were worn uneven (READ - the top ends were 1. 5mm thicker than the bottom). I cleaned both the calipers and the pins that allow the caliper to slide back and forth, and fully compressed & pumped the pistons a couple of times.



I clean the IAT about every 1500 miles (thanks to the exhaust brake).



The EZ is kept on level 2.



My driving habits have remained the same, with the exception of about 4 minutes of idling each day for warm ups now that it is cold. I accelerate moderately (READ - I roll onto the throttle as the rpms increase) and shift at 2000 - 2300.



I acquired a camper shell sometime around the time my mileage started dropping. I think it was about three fill ups after the shell that I noticed the drop had started. Would a camper shell cause that much drag? I was under the impression that it was better than an open bed.



Anything that I missed?
 
Some shells are very un-aerodynamic, surprisingly so. You might remove it if that is practical and see what happens. Also you are now into winter diesel fuel in many parts of the country and that alone will cost 1-2 mpg. Also think back and try to remember any other "coincidences" in the time period. Folr example, aftermarket front bumpers often cost 1-2 mpg.
 
I lost 1. 5 to 2 mpg with a very un-aerodynamic topper on my truck. I didn't think it would make any difference but my mileage immediately improved when I took it off, also solved my low power on the highway complaint.
 
Originally posted by Joseph Donnelly

Some shells are very un-aerodynamic, surprisingly so. You might remove it if that is practical and see what happens. Also you are now into winter diesel fuel in many parts of the country and that alone will cost 1-2 mpg. Also think back and try to remember any other "coincidences" in the time period. Folr example, aftermarket front bumpers often cost 1-2 mpg.



Other than the shell, and the fuel pumps, and oh yeah, a grill guard and air springs, nothing really heavy has been added.



I will take the shell off this weekend to see how it goes for a couple of tanks.



The winter fuel for the last three years has not bothered me too much here in Denver. If any, maybe . 5 mpg.
 
Just in case it got overlooked, you might want to try the air and fuel filter if they had not been done in a while.
 
Grille guards can also increase turbulence and cost mpg. To meet corp. avg. fuel economy (cafe) requirements by the feds, Dodge spends a lot of time on aerodynamics. Notice the beds aren't square anymore, but narrower at the rear, for example. The air dam was something like $22 back in 1997, standard now. They have to balance style and aerodynamics. When you put on a guard and a boxy bumper whose bottom surface is a lot higher, mpg often suffers. Much more air gets underneath with a lot of aftermarket bumpers and the underneath is aerodynamically very "dirty"--meaning it adds a lot of drag. Some of us are old enough to remember Jere Stahl's Hemi in 1966. He had a huge "sign" under the front bumper with "Plymouth" on it. No one back then caught on that it was really an air dam for an A/Stock car that went about 120 mph in the quarter mile.
 
Originally posted by kaptn

Winter Diesel caused a 2 mpg loss on my truck?



Not as much heat energy in blended winter fuel. Has to do with adding in the #1 diesel instead of having straight #2 in the summer.
 
On my CTD, I've added a grille guard and removed the air dam. It made 0 difference in mileage and I check it every tank. However, I had a cab-high shell on my 96 gasser and as soon as I removed it, the mileage increased. I would say that the combination of shell and aggressive tires are hurting your mileage.



Jim
 
Sticks, my guess would be the winter cut fuel. Try maybe getting your fuel somewhere different that you trust, and see if that makes a difference. I just went from 19. 5 to 17. 5 in the past 3 weeks. Just my . 02 Don
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top