Signal73 said:somehow I think if it windowed the block the same replies would be posted.
Its the fact that it made 1000+ Hp, not how reliable it will turn out to be...
Someone already said it. How often does stuff break on a dyno vs. on the strip or hooked to a sled, and its already puking coolant.
I would get some runs on the track with it at 1000+ before I got out my pom-pom's
$0. 02
Morse said:Even if it grenades tomorrow, that's still very impressive. If they break at that power level, then maybe they can figure out why, and correct the problems one issue at a time. . The person that posted the numbers, did say it was a little early to compare with the likes of Maddog. They said once it prooved reliable, the could then start to compare to him. . I thought that was nice to say. . The biggest question I have for now is, what was the correction factor used? That can make a huge difference at these power levels. . I hope they were uncorrected. .
Yo Hoot said:
nwpadmax said:I think you know the answer to that one, Rod.
Apparently most of the folks on the DP want that to be a cheerleading-only thread. If you watch the video, it's blowing a lot of steam at the end of the run. The owner stated that the injector cups (which are a LB7-only issue) were "lifting" and letting gases into the coolant channels in the head.
I asked a few questions and it was like I said the emperor had no clothes.
And until someone teaches me how you can diagnose internal motor problems without disassembling it, I say there's no way one can determine if it is injector cups or head gaskets.
I wasn't trying to be chief dark cloud or spread doubt, but many are already yapping about taking her to the "next level"... .
The truck is built like a dragracer, not a puller, so hopefully come spring we'll see how it lasts on the strip.
Dockboy said:I agree!!!
Another thing is it was on a Dynojet 224 with a load brake. You CAN NOT compare those numbers to 248C numbers!!!!!![]()
I have personally seen trucks that did 450-500 on 248C's do 700+ on a 224 w/brake with no changes to the truck. The 248C numbers were closer to what the track times indicated!![]()
Like I said in that thread, if it's truely putting down 1000, it will do high 9's to low 10's at the track. Unfortunately, my gut tells me it won't get out of the 11's![]()
JasonCzerak said:I'm pondering posting a thread over there:
"dodge diesel does 1500hp and streetable with stock turbo!!!"
And scan in hand drawn dyno graph, or claim it's was lost when the computer crash.
this is all great that this guy did 1000hp. But yeah, like dockboy said, if his 1/4 mile times don't back it up... .
Will we get the ricer/ford mustang excuse of "I didn't have the boost turned up, or my starter it acting up?"
nwpadmax said:Yup, if it was my truck, I would have found a SuperFlow with twin eddy current absorbers to run it on (the ~1500 hp AutoDyn). I've been on the little brother 700 hp version once and it's unbelievable how for a couple seconds that thing is literally absorbing everything the truck can possibly make. Foot buried to the floor and the motor rpm doesn't change. That's a load cell test!
Now if I had one, I'd let it do its normal thing and run it up to the rev limiter, but I'd make it draw the motor back down. Bring the thing to its knees like a pulling sled does. Then take a look at the area under the torque curve. [/QUOTE]
I couldn't agree more , I have done bolth but the load seems to be (I think anyways) more beleiveable. there are to many factors in just spinning to win