Here I am

EPA - All diesel engines.

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

I can't believe my local dealer stocks this....

Spanked a Powerstroke yesterday

LIGHT & MEDIUM TRUCK MAGAZINE, JULY 2004 ISSUE:







EPA to Propose Retrofitting All Diesel Engines



Environmental Protection Agency officials said the agency would push for all 11 million diesel engines in the country to be retrofitted within 10 years in order to reduce their emissions of particulate matter.



Marge Oge, director of EPA's Office of Transporation and Air Quality, announced the goal at a Diesel Technology Forum conference in Washington, D. C. , in June.



Oge said the agency would work with fleets to develop financial incentives to accomplish the retrofitting. Estimates of what the retrofitting would cost varied widely, from millions of dollars to billions.



All diesel engines from trucks to construction equipment, would be included.



Heavy trucks using ultra-low-sulfur diesel and a particulate-matter filter would reduce PM emissions by 90%, said Jim Blubaugh, program director of the agency's Office of Transportation and Air Quality, adding that those filters would cost $4,000 to $8,000 per truck. Diesel oxidation catalysts can operate without ULSD, reduce PM by 20% and cost between $800 and $1,500 he said.



Allen Schaeffer, executive director of the Diesel Technology Forum, said retrofitting all 11 million diesel engines could cost billions.



Blubaugh said the agency will begin working with small fleets in 2005 to develop a grant-based incentive program to help them retrofit older trucks. --- Mindy Long



I just wonder if this will pertain to all our Dodge diesel pick-ups?
 
There is no way they will get that to happen.



Some truck drivers can barely make ends meet now, and they are expected to shell out that much money?



And what happens when all this new stuff get plugged up? Then they have to drop another huge chunk of cash for a new one? Then they will get hit with huge disposal fees for getting rid of the old ones... .
 
Originally posted by MKoth

There is no way they will get that to happen.



Some truck drivers can barely make ends meet now, and they are expected to shell out that much money?



And what happens when all this new stuff get plugged up? Then they have to drop another huge chunk of cash for a new one? Then they will get hit with huge disposal fees for getting rid of the old ones... .





Exactally, Good luck on getting this to work!
 
This is a incredible waste of money:mad: :mad: Lets take that money and spend it shooting tree hugers. Imagine the pollution savings with even 1 less person here. :D
 
Better yet what happens when this garbage equipment raises EGT's and guys start melting pistons?



What a waste of time. Might as well force everyone to paint their trucks pink also since pink paint produces lower pollution
 
Is the EPA going to come after my 1954 D2 and my 1971 Ford 3000 also? How are they going to know about them since they are not registor with any government agency.



Kevin
 
The EPA ... if any group of people who need to have their heads sawed off while still alive ... it is these "people".
 
Originally posted by SEmerson

This is a incredible waste of money:mad: :mad: Lets take that money and spend it shooting tree hugers. Imagine the pollution savings with even 1 less person here. :D



I second that. The EPA can go #$%# itself!
 
Originally posted by 2broke2smoke

put anything you want on my trucks ...



i took it all off before and i can take it all off again



Amen to that!!



if theirs one type of people i can't stand its the liberals they should just go live in the forest and leave the normal people alone
 
Originally posted by OaborbaG

Amen to that!!



if theirs one type of people i can't stand its the liberals they should just go live in the forest and leave the normal people alone



The problem is is that they don't live in the woods, they live in their condos in the city and then dictate to those of us that do live out in the woods what we can and mostly can not do on our land. :mad: :mad: :mad:



Kevin
 
Originally posted by OaborbaG

Amen to that!!



if theirs one type of people i can't stand its the liberals they should just go live in the forest and leave the normal people alone



The problem is is that they don't live in the woods, they live in their condos in the city and then dictate to those of use that do live out in the woods what we can and mostly can not do on our land.



Kevin
 
Originally posted by RobertBolinger

Actually, it would be real easy to enforce by requiring certification to buy fuel :(



As long as they don't require the certification to siphon fuel out of one tank and into another... :D
 
Back
Top