Here I am

extended oil changes

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

NV5600 vs G56 6spd's - Comparison yet?

Which After Market Air Filter???

Status
Not open for further replies.
amsoilman said:
The information I read on the GM's "Patented (OLS) Oil Life System" came from an article in "Lubes N Greases" Vol. 10 Issue 5 titled "Supersize me! GM moves to extended drain intervals. "



The article states that each OLS computer model is "engine specific" because GM believes each engine behaves differently under various driving situations and conditions, and includes the engines "operational data" including temperature, RPM's and speed. They go on to say "(QUOTE)Driving styles vary as well. The OLS allegedly calculates all factors pertaining to both the engine and the driver and thereby makes its oil change recommendations. " According to GM senior Project Engineer, Robert Stockwell, who has been studying analyzed oil samples from vehicles with OLS, "In all cases where the OIL LIFE SYSTEM signaled for an oil change it was before the oil was worn out. "and how long were the drain intervals? Many of these samples, said Stockwell, "were from vehicles with greater then 10,000 miles on the oil, a few with more than 14,000 miles and at least one with 16,000 miles. These Intervals were recorded in vehicles using regular "Mineral" oil. Synthetic oil gets even longer oil change intervals. " The "owner's manual" in today's GM fleet no longer make specific milaeage recommendations at all. "(END-QUOTE)



Wayne

amsoilman



I'm not sure what is on the brand new gm's , I'm just referring to the systems available in the past few years, which were simply a counter. I don't care what GM claims they did, they were just a counter. Either way, they can count all they want, gm's are still POS' :-laf
 
LightmanE300,

Just giving you some facts! Since GM is the World's largest Auto maker, others will follow, and eventually the 3,000 mile oil drain will go away.

As a side note, despite the clear environmental benefits of extending drain intervals, the Major oil Companies dug in their heels. For more than three decades now, the message of regular, frequent oil changes has been sold to consumers and the mechanics who service vehicles. Billions of dollars have been spent advertising and training to reinforce this "change your oil every 3,000 miles" mantra. This also was in the article.

I'm an older person, and grew up when my Dad was changing oil every 1,500 miles, then he went to 2,000 miles! I was taught to do the same. However, some 25 years ago I changed my mind!



Everyone has their own idea's, and that's alright! I have no problem with that, but if I choose to use a high grade engine oil, and have it analyzed periodicly, and it is still "functional", Why should I change it? My choice, right?







Wayne



Wayne

amsoilman
 
Wayne I totally agree, I was just jokingly referring to the older GM counters - I'm sure what you posted is accurate. I also agree it's hard to let go of the older school of thought when it was drilled into your head that these short intervals were necessary for the life of your engine. . but have made the leap a few years ago and am enjoying the benefits of extended drains :)
 
I have no problem with what I personally consider extend drain intervals - in my typically RV towing service, that comfort zone is about 12,000 miles or around where I am on my own current extended run. In past years, that would equate to about a year in the crankcase, and that is long enough to suit me. Other tests have indicated that dino oils are entirely capable of 32,000 miles or so between changes, and THAT is without bypass filtration. ;)



My OTHER interest in my own extended run, as covered in another related thread, is dispelling the notion that ONLY synthetics are suitable for extended use, when it's pretty clear that dino oil such as the Delo 400 I am using will ALSO go on satisfactorily for FAR greater mileage than most realize! OR, as I like to put it:



"You don't HAVE to use expensive SYNTHETICS to benefit from extended drain intervals - the Dino oils will do that TOO!"
 
Gary - K7GLD said:
I have no problem with what I personally consider extend drain intervals - in my typically RV towing service, that comfort zone is about 12,000 miles or around where I am on my own current extended run. In past years, that would equate to about a year in the crankcase, and that is long enough to suit me. Other tests have indicated that dino oils are entirely capable of 32,000 miles or so between changes, and THAT is without bypass filtration. ;)



My OTHER interest in my own extended run, as covered in another related thread, is dispelling the notion that ONLY synthetics are suitable for extended use, when it's pretty clear that dino oil such as the Delo 400 I am using will ALSO go on satisfactorily for FAR greater mileage than most realize! OR, as I like to put it:



"You don't HAVE to use expensive SYNTHETICS to benefit from extended drain intervals - the Dino oils will do that TOO!"

Gary,

I realize I have conversed with you on this subject many times, and I truly do respect your views! However, as I have pointed out to you before, there are MANY more benefits for useing synthetics vs. Dyno oils, and one of the greater ones is wear! Extended oil drains is just one of the benefits.



I do not know where you came up with the 32,000 mile figure for Dyno, but I have never heard that one... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ..... unless of course you are speaking of that kind of mileage when using in OVER-THE-ROAD 18 wheelers, and they do use by-pass oil filters, plus they have a VERY large oil sump.



Never heard of 32,000 mile drains in regular automotive use, unless it was a high grade synthetic, and AMsoil does have a class 5 basestock 35,000/one year oil.



Premium synthetic motor oils when measured for Kinematic Viscosity, Viscosity Index, Cold Crank Apparent Viscosity, Borderline Pumping Temperature, Pour Point, Flash & Fire Point, High Temp, High Shear Viscosity, Foaming Tendency, Four Ball Wear, Noak Volatility, Using the ASTM Standards for thes tests, are superior to conventional petroleum oils.



This truth is never even questioned by industry Professionals.



Best regards my friend,



Wayne

amsoilman
 
Wayne, you asked for some sort of "proof" for my statement as to dino oil being capable of extended use - out to about 32,000 miles. Documentation for those specific articles are not in my database, going from memory on info read over the past several years on the issue - I *have* posted the specific material on one or another board in the past, and will try to locate one for posting here.



MEANWHILE, I *DID* do an Internet search on "extended oil drains", and came up with TONS of related info, covering both synthetics and dino-based oils - random samplings from a half-dozen or so sources are submitted below - and ALL of those are based upon dino-based lubes.



2 things will become immediately evident - most lube testing out in the "real world" is done on FLEETS of vehicles due to their tendency to pile up lots of miles in a short period of time, and also more consistent operating conditions with fewer anomolies to artificially slew results.



AND, most extended drain test scenarios are based upon, or include bypass oil filtration, with the significantly improved reduction in contaminant volume and particle size they provide.



Here's a few exerpts on extended drain, as presented by various lube industry experts:



======



There is some evidence that synthetic oils can help extend oil drain intervals, but you have to carefully balance the price premium against expected savings. You may need to look beyond extending your drains and consider other benefits of synthetics, such as superior cold-weather starting and improved fuel mileage.



"Synthetic base oil tends to be able to survive the impact of heat longer, therefore the additive system is not under as great a stress, and the overall package is more durable in some of the areas that tend to break oil down," Betner says.

However, he warns fleet managers that synthetics are not a magic bullet when it comes to oil drain intervals.

"Synthetic oil can be misunderstood or misused in light of the many factors affecting drain interval," he says. "Keep in mind that various types of contaminants can be the limiting factor, and synthetic oils cannot overcome the negative impact of some of these contaminants, such as dirt and coolant contamination. "




Noal says, "When we talk to fleets about the increased ability of this technology to extend oil drains we use the term `optimize' to emphasize the fact that extended oil drains should not be the main focus for fleets looking to extend service intervals. Even though we have fleets that are getting 50,000 to 60,000 miles between oil changes, we want to encourage fleets to look at all systems on the vehicle. Other components on the truck may need lubrication at shorter intervals than the desired engine drain and may suffer if the truck only comes in for servicing at those extended marks. "



Some aftermarket filter advertising claims might make you think that all you need to extend your oil drain intervals is to buy their filter. ChevronTexaco's Gary Parsons advises fleets against relying heavily on just the filter.

"They shouldn't assume just by putting a higher quality filter on will allow them to extend their service intervals," he says. "When it comes to the life of the oil, the filtration isn't usually the condemning limit. It's more the ability of the oil to neutralize acid. " As for filters removing soot, he notes that if the oil is doing its job and keeping the soot dispersed, the particles will be too small - typically . 2 microns - to be caught by most filters.



Numerous tests and studies have shown that solid contaminants in the 1-15

micron range are responsible for the majority of normal wear within an engine.



Ninety-eight percent of the solid contaminants generated within engines is

below 10 microns in size.




A factory full-flow filter is designed to remove large particles that could damage vital parts. The full-flow filter does little to reduce normal wear within the engine. The vast majority of solid contaminants generated within the engine are below 10 microns in size. As shown below, the full-flow filter is only capable of controlling 15-micron-and up articles, allowing the smaller size contaminants to pass into the lube oil. Once introduced to the lubrication system, the oil has the job of suspending these tiny particles within the additive package. However, abrasive contaminants in the oil tend to grind away at bearings, cams, and other engine parts, causing the normal wear. UF by-pass filters are capable of removing and controlling particles down to 1-micron size range. By using UF by-pass filtration, fleets can accomplish extended engine life.



ExxonMobil's Bolkhovsky recommends taking a step-by-step approach to extending oil drain intervals.



"Let's say you're going out to 40,000 miles as your targeted goal for oil drain extension and you're currently at 20,000 miles," he says. "You probably don't want to move from 20,000 to 40,000 in one step, taking a big risk with your equipment. You move to 30,000 miles and look at what the data is telling you, then your next step would probably be to 40,000. "



If your fleet is large enough, Bolkhovsky suggests taking a small subset of your equipment and testing the extended drains on them first. Test the vehicles that are run under the most severe conditions first. If they can handle the extended drain interval, then your less-stressed engines should have no problem.



You also want to check at oil drain intervals beyond where you want to end up to make sure you have a safety factor built in.

"If you want to go to 30,000, you might want to take it out to 35,000 or 38,000 and then back it off a little to make sure there's a safety factor there," says Spinner II's Weaver.



===========





SO, there you have several references to pretty high mileage use on dino-based lubes.



And for the record, *I* have never downplayed the additional benefits provided by synthetics over dino-based lubes - I only question their actual value vs greater expense for the AVERAGE truck owner as represented by this group - and I have steadily resisted the implication that only synthetics were worthy of consideration in extended mileage use.



Cuz THAT just ain't true! ;) :D
 
Gary,

I agree with what they are saying, but can you tell me if the statement that "NOAL" makes is talking about synthetics, or petroleum oils.



Noal says, "When we talk to fleets about the increased ability of this technology to extend oil drains we use the term `optimize' to emphasize the fact that extended oil drains should not be the main focus for fleets looking to extend service intervals. Even though we have fleets that are getting 50,000 to 60,000 miles between oil changes, we want to encourage fleets to look at all systems on the vehicle. Other components on the truck may need lubrication at shorter intervals than the desired engine drain and may suffer if the truck only comes in for servicing at those extended marks. "



Appears to me he is talking about synthetics here, as he refers to the "increased ability of this technology to extend oil drains... ... ... ... ... ... ..... "





Wayne

amsoilman
 
Last edited:
why is there a time limit imposed on some extended drain instructions? such as "change oil after 15000 miles OR ONE YEAR". If I only run 5000 miles in a year, why should i have to change the oil, especially if using amsoil?
 
Okey0 said:
why is there a time limit imposed on some extended drain instructions? such as "change oil after 15000 miles OR ONE YEAR". If I only run 5000 miles in a year, why should i have to change the oil, especially if using amsoil?

If an oil was designed to run for 15,000 miles/one year, and you only run 5,000 miles in that year, there is a strong possibility of contaminants within the oil due to your "short runs" and not allowig the oil to heat up to its operating temperature. The biggest concern is the moisture, which would allow acids to build which in turn would cause the oil to get out of its Viscosity range etc. . There are many other things that begin to form when this happens. This is the reasoning behind the 15,000/one year requirements.



Wayne

amsoilman
 
"Appears to me he is talking about synthetics here, as he refers to the "increased ability of this technology to extend oil drains... ... ... ... ... ... ..... "



Wayne, as I recall, the "technology" referred to there was in reference to use of "UF", (Ultra-Fine) oil filtration - several of those references I posted were based on UF technology, and none of them made any reference to the use of synthetics other than the top quote which did comment on use of synthetics.



For the record (again), there were LOTS of similar articles in that search either BY Amsoil, or in reference to it in extended drain intervals - of course, a few other synthetic brands were covered as well. But I tried to limit quotes to only those from oil refiners that don't have, or were not promoting synthetics...



And here's another comment I'd like to mention - IF *I* was in some way forced to extended drain intervals of long duration, with the free choice of ANY conventional, OR synthetic lube of my choosing - NO CONTEST, it would be top synthetic like Amsoil, no doubt about it! ;) :D Oo.
 
amsoilman said:
If an oil was designed to run for 15,000 miles/one year, and you only run 5,000 miles in that year, there is a strong possibility of contaminants within the oil due to your "short runs" and not allowig the oil to heat up to its operating temperature. The biggest concern is the moisture, which would allow acids to build which in turn would cause the oil to get out of its Viscosity range etc. . There are many other things that begin to form when this happens. This is the reasoning behind the 15,000/one year requirements.



Wayne

amsoilman



so after the year, if i send in a sample and it comes back good to go, would that negate the need to change the oil?
 
Okey0 said:
so after the year, if i send in a sample and it comes back good to go, would that negate the need to change the oil?
I would say if it came back "suitable for continued use" it would be OK.



Wayne

amsoilman
 
"I would say if it came back "suitable for continued use" it would be OK. "



But ONLY if regular analysis is done, extended oil usage AND only ANNUAL analysis is a VERY poor idea!



Suppose some serious internal problem arose shortly after your annual analysis - and it was 11 months until your NEXT analysis...



Get the picture? ;) ;)



Regular analysis is a DERN good idea for extended oil usage - and can pretty well wipe out the cost savings of extended drains when combined with $10 a quart oil! ;) :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top