Here I am

Engine/Transmission (1998.5 - 2002) Filter minder sensitivity

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

Engine/Transmission (1998.5 - 2002) 3cyl question...

Engine/Transmission (1994 - 1998) Best Pulling Clutch????

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ever wonder about the accuracy of your Filter Minder attached to your air cleaner and what the various markings on it translate to in common pressure values?



Related to that, are the references to "PSI", "inches of vacuum", "inches HG" and similar units commonly used in various atmospheric measurements - some of us get careless (including me!) in making pressure references, when actually there are vast differences in units between PSI and inches of vacuum, etc.



Here's a handy conversion table, displaying the relationship between 1 PSI and various other common units of measure:



#ad




As can be seen, there's a substantial difference between them!



I wanted to point that out before starting with the following demo of readings taken on my own '02 truck's Filter Minder, so a proper perspective could be arrived at.



Below is the zero reading as displayed on my own vacuum pump designed to bleed brakes and test emissions devices, it reads in "inches HG", and as can be seen, the Filter Minder is not yet deflected



-



And here is a shot with the Filter Minder at full deflection - and the vacuum gauge indicating about 2 inches HG:



#ad




From this, a reasonable estimate can be made as to the readings on the Filter Minder between zero and 100% - and as can also be seen, at least for my specific Filter Minder, 100% occurs at about 1 PSI flow restriction across the filter element itself - or about 27 column inches of water. This is the point DC recommends that the filter element be changed.



There are a number of related points of interest as far as atmospheric pressure seen at the intake of our engines is concerned - such as the actual measured efficiency of various aftermarket air ducting and filtering devices as compared to the stock setup - what do they actually provide in improved performance and efficiency - and are actual figures/comparisons even provided? Some aftermarket outfits make rather extensive claims, but often have, or provide absolutely no test data to back those claims.



In my own case, the stock OEM filter on my truck when it was new seemed to perform properly while the truck was stock - but as soon as I installed the Edge Comp and headed up a grade towing our 5th wheel RV, the filter minder immediately pulled down 2/3 of the way! :eek:



It was obvious that the added power and turbo boost provided by the Comp demanded better airflow! ;)



I subsequently drilled the air filter box for increased air flow, and installed a K&N filter - and had no further issues. Later, I switched to the even better BHAF filter.



SO, it might be a good idea to get our airflow terminology straight, take a few measurements - and ASK a few questions when casual claims are made as to "better air flow" and "increased power" - talk is cheap, seat-of-pants reports aren't worth the rivets in your Levis - and actual figures are worth GOLD! ;) :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi Gary

I always enjoy your informative posts and great pictures! I'm going to check out the filter minder and see if it works. In 101k miles it only move once during a trip through the Rockies while towing. I now have a bhaf and will add the filter minder to the closed end after checking it out . It's snowing today(nothing else to do!) :-laf



George
 
georgej said:
Hi Gary

I always enjoy your informative posts and great pictures! I'm going to check out the filter minder and see if it works. In 101k miles it only move once during a trip through the Rockies while towing. I now have a bhaf and will add the filter minder to the closed end after checking it out . It's snowing today(nothing else to do!) :-laf



George



Thanks for the kind words George - information is what this board is all about! ;)



Here's where my own Filter Minder is installed on my BHAF - and will do similar when I soon install the new Donaldson Nano Fiber setup:



#ad
 
Depends on any mods, and usage - normal driving with a stock engine, the OEM filter and intake setup is adequate - but work it hard, mod for higher boost levels and let the filter element get dirty, and it will likely show on the filter minder.



On the other hand, the filter minders aren't exactly laboratory grade instruments - so it might be a good idea to check it out if you plan to rely upon it for your decision as to proper airflow and element change for the engine.



I'm hoping a few other members might pop in with similar tests of their own filter minders to see how much they vary in accuracy from one to another...
 
All I have is the stock airbox with holes in the bottom part. Filter minder has never moved. I've had the filter in there for about 1. 5 years... should probably pull it out and take a look some time. It's just a Napa Gold stock one.
 
I agree Gary a great write up as always. My Fliter Minder has never moved but then I change the stock filter every 12,000 miles where it needs it or not. I tend to change normal maintenance stuff way less than other people for cheap insurance.
 
Gary good info but the accuracy of the gauge you used can be questionable.

I think you are dead on for the info you posted but at I believe its around 28 inches h20 is a near perfect vacuum. At that point your engine would not hardly run at full load or at needed amount of air at that point you would be blowing black smoke and have no power and high egt's. The filter minders "Should" read 100% before that point to prevent engine damage. But as you stated these are not the most accurate measuring devices. Generally at 18 inches h2O most manufactures tell is about the end of peak performance. anything over that is zapping power and performance and economy. As a rule of thumb I generally service or change the filter if it is at 50% mark due to not knowing how accurate the minder is.
 
Gary good info but the accuracy of the gauge you used can be questionable.



Possibly - frankly, I had expected the range of the Filter Minder to be up higher on the scale of my gauge - but even at that, as you point out, the results I got seem to track pretty well with suggested filter change recommendations.



Plus, the 50% point of about 16 inches of vacuum (about 1/2 lb PSI) as measured by my test happens to fall at the point many filter makers seem to use as the spec test point for specifying the flow rates for their respective filter elements, which also seems reasonable.



Perhaps when I do the swapout to my new Donaldson Nanofiber air filter, and have the Filter Minder out again, I can make up a temporary water column manometer to verify my cruder vacuum gauge...



But bottom line seems to be that while my gauge isn't as sophisticated as we would like, it probably isn't all that far off, either.
 
Gary - K7GLD said:
Perhaps when I do the swapout to my new Donaldson Nanofiber air filter, and have the Filter Minder out again, I can make up a temporary water column manometer to verify my cruder vacuum gauge...



Do you plan on drilling and mounting your filter minder in the Nanofiber? I'd like to see pics of your modification work there.



Nice write-up as usual, Gary!



-Chuck
 
I have a walker air sep so I put my factory minder in the tube between the filter and turbo because I got rid of the factory airbox I mounted my remote oil filters in that spot. I just put an amsoil Ea filter on it that has a filter minder hole in the end of it. The cheapest filter minder I could find was 1 that GM has on their pickups for $20 with grommet. Local dodge dealer wanted $90 for minder alone :--) . I put that in the filter so I am now running 2 1 in filter and 1 in intake tube. It will be interesting to see if they read differently in future.
 
Duluth Diesel said:
Do you plan on drilling and mounting your filter minder in the Nanofiber? I'd like to see pics of your modification work there.



Nice write-up as usual, Gary!



-Chuck



I'll probably do the same as I did with my BHAF, and drill the end plate for the Filter Minder:



#ad




Makes a good spot - and about as accurate a restriction reading point as you are likely to get with a setup like this.



Local dodge dealer wanted $90 for minder alone



HOLY COW! :eek:



Looks like DC does consider these things as laboratory quality! ;) :-laf
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top