Im in the crowd that cant tell much difference in performance.
About the only difference I can tell is the temp gauge is consistantly lower than before. I like knowing that less heat usually means less wear.
EGT's are the same, so combustion shouldnt suffer.
Fuel mileage is about the same, if anything has lost 1/2 mpg, but cant prove it, certainly hasnt gone up on average. Just went about 1525 miles on my 100 gal system, and the fuel light just came on, which is about normal. Lots of stop & go driving, so cant complain.
Staying at around 17mpg for city driving. Thats what it got before the therm.
Throttle response is about the same.
I'd say Air temps seem to make more difference in throttle response & power than coolant temps.
Maybe for someone that was right on the edge of a temp window in the cpu, the therm may make a difference (kicking them into a different timing setting), but hasnt been the magic goodie in my case.
Oh, and while pulling heavy in the desert up long grades, it doesnt really help keep temps down, once its open, it doesnt matter what its rating is, if full water flow wasnt enough before, it wont be now. Will still creep up to 200+ when overdoing the capacity of the cooling system. Example, pulling Halloran pass coming back from Vegas in 115* heat. Keeping EGT's at 1200, but Coolant temps were starting to run-away. Had to let off & go down a gear to keep coolant temps in check. 180 Thermostat didnt help. Still could use more cooling capacity IMO. At stock power its probably no problem.