Sure I have seen reports of VP input psi from 1 psi to over 30 psi. Also the argument "as long as it is positive it is ok", also the in tank lp psi "fix" is fairly low. However everyone is guessing as to what the real psi should be.
One of the VP rebuilders (II, Bret) posted that the Bosch spec was 13. 5 psi. SouthEast Power Systems (we had a club meeting there recently) I asked the same question and they said the Bosch test stand spec was 10 psi - 15 psi to calibrate the VP44.
As far as I know those are the only directly attributable precise VP44 psi definitions I have run across in 4 years because I want to know what the heck it is as well.
II (Bret) said the problem is the diaphram seals are only designed to flex 5mm with 13. 5 psi as the "no flex psi". He feels 5mm flex allowed to be within specs so the seals are not distorted is about 3 psi. Over or under the 5mm flex of the diaphram the seals begin to distort and in time (depending on the severity of the distortion and the cycles of distortion) the seals fail which prevent the high pressure side of the VP44 from being sealed and therefore no high pressure which prevents the injection cycle from happening, and therefore "failure". I think the diaphram has been updated over the years from a steel diaphram to a stainless steel diaphram. I am not sure why (not a metalurist or dynamic engineer) but I would surmise that the newer diaphram is designed to last longer and was therefore a weak point in the past.
In BK old post of "pumps, lines, and whatnot" they found that as the input psi got over about 20 psi the return fuel at the same operating conditions became hotter, indicating more stress was happening internally at the same work level. That thread even took the input psi to 50 psi to see what would happen. That is a long thread, but worth reading. Their summary was the input psi probably should not go over about 20 psi.
There is very very little true factual data on what the design specs for fuel input should be to the VP44. All I have been able to find is stated above and therefore I run mine at 13. 5 idle to 16 WOT trying to maintain as close to design specs as possible. Volume is a seperate issue and I think that the larger fuel feed lines (AN-6 or greater and only full flow fittings) are a good thing, but have no factual data to support that assumption.
I have zero idea as to what happens with altitude only knowing that altitude does change the characteristics (physical or chemical) of most fluids.
All in all, it is a crap shoot trying to keep the VP44 running.
Bob Weis