I remember that on my 01 that the VP 44 cooling requirements could raise the whole fuel system potentially to 190F on a summer day during extended driving. On the fuel return line I installed a fuel cooler in front of my A/C condensor (a good 7 pass 1/2" tube dia. X 3/4" thin X15" long) transmission cooler to help the problem. I live in Houston so we don't worry about fuel freeze here.
The question is does the rail injection system generate the same fuel temperature problem as the VP44 used to and does it have the same potential to cause this effect? Hot diesel fuel at 190F and low pressure like at the suction of our lift pumps can change many operating variables. (1). Vapor pressure changes a lot at low pressures (1-5 psig. or less at 190F) causing centrifical vaned lift pumps to cavitate and that really can reduce longivity. (2). Cool fuel (less than 100F) means more power and efficiency because of a number of reasons but for this case, let's just say it just pumps better because of a stable viscosity and vapor pressure. (3). Lubricicity and viscosity at 190F being sucked from a fuel tank are probably at the limit or beyond the operating design parameters of the present stock lift pump and other parts.
Do some of you smarter than me guys out there have any data as to how much the rail pump cooling requirements effect the total fuel system temperature on a hot summer day pulling a load for extended periods?
I am planning to install a Holly pusher (blue head) pump sucking through a 10 micron Baldwin BF5813 prefuel filter water seperater going to the suction of the stock lift pump but now is the time to cool it on the way too if necessary. I have to custom build this thing because of a two fuel tank application so the FASS won't get it OK!

The question is does the rail injection system generate the same fuel temperature problem as the VP44 used to and does it have the same potential to cause this effect? Hot diesel fuel at 190F and low pressure like at the suction of our lift pumps can change many operating variables. (1). Vapor pressure changes a lot at low pressures (1-5 psig. or less at 190F) causing centrifical vaned lift pumps to cavitate and that really can reduce longivity. (2). Cool fuel (less than 100F) means more power and efficiency because of a number of reasons but for this case, let's just say it just pumps better because of a stable viscosity and vapor pressure. (3). Lubricicity and viscosity at 190F being sucked from a fuel tank are probably at the limit or beyond the operating design parameters of the present stock lift pump and other parts.
Do some of you smarter than me guys out there have any data as to how much the rail pump cooling requirements effect the total fuel system temperature on a hot summer day pulling a load for extended periods?
I am planning to install a Holly pusher (blue head) pump sucking through a 10 micron Baldwin BF5813 prefuel filter water seperater going to the suction of the stock lift pump but now is the time to cool it on the way too if necessary. I have to custom build this thing because of a two fuel tank application so the FASS won't get it OK!

