I've topped off twice this month and thought I'd update my info. Both filled at the pump. Same trailer on all the towing so the weight was generally ~20K GCW.
The first top off was in preparation for a family camping/road trip.
Miles: 3004
Hours: 107
Gallons of DEF: 2.965
MPG DEF: 1013
Average DEF GPH: 0.028
Gallons of Diesel: 220
MPG Diesel: 13.7
Average Diesel GPH: 2.1
% DEF:Fuel: 1.3% (lowest yet)
Towing miles: 724/24%
I then topped off today after the road trip to see what my usage was.
Miles: 2144
Gallons of DEF: 4.024
MPG DEF: 533
Average DEF GPH: 0.073
Gallons of Diesel: 192.7
MPG Diesel: 11.1
Average GPH Diesel: 3.5
% DEF:Fuel: 2.1% (tied for highest)
Towing miles: 1642/77%
I was initially surprised at the difference, but it's the added towing and much higher average GPH making more NOx.
Since I bought it
Miles: 17,805
Gallons of DEF: 23.778
MPG DEF: 748.8
Gallons of Diesel: 1377.5
MPG Diesel: 12.9
%DEF:Fuel: 1.7%
Towing miles: 5948/33.5%
It’s not blanket. One need a count of accel & decel events. (Slight throttle changes not in contention). Entering a highway. Climbing a grade. Slowing for construction. Exiting.
Understanding that ANY on-highway brake use (besides downgrade & marked curves) is poor skill; brakes effectively
burn a huge amount of fuel.
Same for steering corrections. (This is all Fuel Economy stuff). Number of steering corrections per 100-miles
is a factor.
(This post is about standing in those shoes. Not about the man wrote it).
Friend, the test is to run the pickup over some of the same course (unhitched) but otherwise carries the same load (Scale it). Same speed and cautions at the wheel (AS IF you were hitched). 200-miles round trip should do it.
Travel trailer fuel burn penalty is 40% as an average 1970 or 2020.
Aerodynamic. The added weight
is an emotional problem. RVers ain’t at all capable of sorting the mechanical from that (you are).
An FE test where cruise control is allowed to be The Drivetrain Manager
sorts the differences in a way you’d appreciate.
I can run 30k in the box —
and on some of the most difficult U.S. Interstate terrain — let the cruise + engine brake control the speed with virtually no input from me.
Doing it again (same settings) while empty means (mainly) a higher average MPH.
The DEF burn rate
doesn’t change as much as the fuel consumption rate. It doesn’t change much at all. They simply don’t track each other when the engine is in or near design specs.
Granted, these things (tests & observations) are easier in commercial work at 10,000-miles/month.
Engine
demand has to be removed from poor driver skill.
But the start till has to be the control of idle time percentage of total engine hours. Without that, your figures are missing THE crucial number.
Big truck fleet spec won’t allow more than a few minutes of idle time. At all. Unless outdoor ambient temps are very high. At 1.25-gals/hr diesel consumption (coolant + oil temps kept above 150F),
DEF consumption goes thru the roof.
If you establish a
low year-round idle time percentage (no such thing as “winter fuel”; energetic content change is under 5%)
then your other recorded numbers have some meaning
where you’ve also reckoned Aero + Weight changes via drivetrain consistency (computer control of speed).
DEF, (granted), so what? It’s another peek at computer-control. You haven’t believed me in years past re FE or hitch-rigging to make your own tests (this stuff is simple), so here’s another chance.
With respect, were I to decide to employ MAD programming with my CTD,
why would I wish to engage your services as it’d be analogous to hiring someone without big truck experience to program that vehicle?
I’m only trying to say that
there are insights arising from testing —
and changing driver habits to incorporate them — that can’t be obtained otherwise.
I get a good laugh out of guys who disbelieve my MPG numbers
thinking I only run slower.
DEF Burn IS a marker.
But not when the operator wanders on & off the reservation. He doesn’t know the map boundaries.
Scale that combined rig one day, will ya? (I’ve posted
The Three Pass Scale Method elsewhere). There’s a sweet spot (range) for weight that getting past that changes things.
It’s more the truck than the trailer weight. Understanding what changes the travel trailer brings ISN'T much about it’s weight.
It’s the operator being highlighted.
The
action to take himself OUT of that equation
brings results.
.
.