Yes I fully agree, the propaganda does flow from both directions. You just have to listen to them both and only believe what may happen to match, which usually isn't much.
I commend you for taking the time to see what it is that the Union is trying to get for you, alot of them around here have no idea what the issues at hand are, and just jump on the bandwagon.
I just don't understand why Unions can preach safety, safety, safety, then bust somebody's head when they try to cross the line. They hound the company to create a safe working environment, yet in Kalaehina's and most other cases where the is actually a strike called, it is the Union who is making if unsafe, and it's ok? It's a double standard that I am tired of seeing.
On a more personal note to you and I, why is it that they can preach about job security and no layoff's, but then have a public campaign to drive customers to the competition going at the same time? After the new contract is signed, are they going to have another campaign to get customers back? No, so what have they accomplished? What have they done to help ensure there own job security? Where else in our industry can you go, do the same work, and receive the same pay and benefits that we do? In Kalaehina's case, what happens when all of his customers go to other carriers, or enough of them do leave so that his employer doesn't need everybody they currently have employed? He will lose his job, and have to go to one of the same competitors that benefited from what his Union truely accomplished.
I commend you for taking the time to see what it is that the Union is trying to get for you, alot of them around here have no idea what the issues at hand are, and just jump on the bandwagon.
I just don't understand why Unions can preach safety, safety, safety, then bust somebody's head when they try to cross the line. They hound the company to create a safe working environment, yet in Kalaehina's and most other cases where the is actually a strike called, it is the Union who is making if unsafe, and it's ok? It's a double standard that I am tired of seeing.
On a more personal note to you and I, why is it that they can preach about job security and no layoff's, but then have a public campaign to drive customers to the competition going at the same time? After the new contract is signed, are they going to have another campaign to get customers back? No, so what have they accomplished? What have they done to help ensure there own job security? Where else in our industry can you go, do the same work, and receive the same pay and benefits that we do? In Kalaehina's case, what happens when all of his customers go to other carriers, or enough of them do leave so that his employer doesn't need everybody they currently have employed? He will lose his job, and have to go to one of the same competitors that benefited from what his Union truely accomplished.