kthaxton
TDR MEMBER
I would not waste the time or money with that setup.
Curious what you are basing this on? and are you referring to that particular brand of hitch or weight distributing hitches in general?
I would not waste the time or money with that setup.
Curious what you are basing this on? and are you referring to that particular brand of hitch or weight distributing hitches in general?
Thanks for the info everyone. I'm pretty sure the Rams 2 1/2" receiver hitch will suffice pulling a 8k TT.
I'm pretty sure the Rams 2 1/2" receiver hitch will suffice pulling a 8k TT.
Here is some info from California DMV, but what do they know. I'm sure they have just been duped by the hitch manufacturing conspiracy.
"The trailer should handle well if the weight and hitch adjustments are correct. However, the coupling between a tow vehicle and trailer should also prevent side-to-side motion for the best possible towing comfort and safety.
https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/dmv/?1dmy&urile=wcm:path:/dmv_content_en/dmv/pubs/dl648/dl648pt12
What is the rating on the newer RAM receiver hitches without WD? I have read 1,200 tongue and 12,000 pull.
The rambodybuilder website has the Class V receiver hitch rated at 1,800/18,000.
The info I saw did not specify. I'd look on the hitch possibly?
.
Dasmoeturhead. No doubt you have enough truck for a 8,000 lb trailer wet. What concerns me is the stock
class IV receiver hitch rating. From what I have gathered from TDR and other forums is that the stock receiver
hitch is good for 500 lbs tongue and 10,000 lbs trailer directly on the ball with no help.
OP, I encourage you to investigate all your options in selecting a hitch, and do your research.
Here is some info from California DMV, but what do they know. I'm sure they have just been duped by the hitch manufacturing conspiracy.
"The trailer should handle well if the weight and hitch adjustments are correct. However, the coupling between a tow vehicle and trailer should also prevent side-to-side motion for the best possible towing comfort and safety.
https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/dmv/?1dmy&urile=wcm:path:/dmv_content_en/dmv/pubs/dl648/dl648pt12
As it says, a properly set up hitch should handle well. I'm not disputing that you can go without. But just as Games points out, there are a lot of novices on the road who may not be the expert he is. I've seen enough rear ends dragging to attest to that. Would setting up WD correctly help prevent sway? You bet. If that driver is on the road with me, I hope they have sway control.
Trailer sway does happen. Maybe not to Games, but to others. I choose to travel with something that helps resist that side to side movement.
I'm not going to continue anything else here, this is going nowhere that adds value to the thread. I see now this is not the first trailering thread that games has turned into an emotional rant.
There is a lot of information available from more than manufacturers and brochures. Decide for yourself.
Now games can have the last word and explain again why I'm a gullible idiot.
I believe the same is true but waiting on an answer as to the actual ratings.
I agree. I would also toss the 2" adapter and get a matching 2.5" ball mount with the least amount of drop necessary to level the trailer. I would also stay away from the adjustable types, such as the B/W, they add length. Just an FYI, most 2" ball mounts use a 1" shank ball, the 2.5" use a 1.250" shank. Since my truck still has the 2" receiver I use the forged steel Curt, it has 1.250" also.
Nick
Yes, I do believe the writer is someone who has been " duped by the hitch manufacturing conspiracy", and here is why. In a previous post you compared the need for "sway control" to ABS. ABS is a proven safety feature that has been standard equipment in cars and trucks for over two decades. Commercial vehicles will not pass a DOT inspection if the ABS light is illuminated. Texas is a state that still has vehicle inspections and guess what, the vehicle will not pass if the ABS is inop. The ABS feature is a result of NTSB studies as are seat belts, trailer safety chains, and the battery powered break away system that activates the trailer brakes if it becomes separated from the tow vehicle. The "sway control" scam has been going on for well over two decades, yet it isn't standard equipment or required by any state or the feds. Why? Obviously it has never been proven to be effective or a safety device.
QUOTE=Cjr02;2507680]As it says, a properly set up hitch should handle well. I'm not disputing that you can go without. But just as Games points out, there are a lot of novices on the road who may not be the expert he is. I've seen enough rear ends dragging to attest to that. Would setting up WD correctly help prevent sway? You bet. If that driver is on the road with me, I hope they have sway control.
Trailer sway does happen. Maybe not to Games, but to others. I choose to travel with something that helps resist that side to side movement.
I'm not going to continue anything else here, this is going nowhere that adds value to the thread. I see now this is not the first trailering thread that games has turned into an emotional rant.
There is a lot of information available from more than manufacturers and brochures. Decide for yourself.
Now games can have the last word and explain again why I'm a gullible idiot.
The rambodybuilder website has the Class V receiver hitch rated at 1,800/18,000.
Dasmoeturhead. No doubt you have enough truck for a 8,000 lb trailer wet. What concerns me is the stock
class IV receiver hitch rating. From what I have gathered from TDR and other forums is that the stock receiver
hitch is good for 500 lbs tongue and 10,000 lbs trailer directly on the ball with no help. Being that hindsight is 20-20,
it would be a good idea to weigh the tongue weight loaded before evaluating the hitch set up. I would say that
if the loaded tongue weight is greater than 500 lbs, then a WDH would increase the capacity about a hundred
pounds. The WDH hitch addition is a nice accessory no matter what. If your tongue weight is quite exsessive
I would suggest for peace of mind reasons, to consider a Class V receiver hitch with a 2" square tube.
Suspension Connection sells a Curt #15409 that mounts directly under the OEM, so you can have two
receivers or you can remove the OEM all together. Rated 17,000 lbs trailer and 2550 lbs tongue.
The reason I am replying is because I actually have enough truck too, even as a 2500 SW, and the trailer
is 7970 lbs wet. However the tongue weight is a whopping 1400 lbs! I don't know how to change the way we
load up in order to redistribute for better balance. We would have to empty all the front bedroom closets
and empty out the pots and pans and drawers in the kitchen and stuff everything in the back every time
we go out. That's not going to happen. I consider our loading as a typical. Wouldn't a trailer mfg consider
typical loading? Maybe the undercarriage has something to do with it. From the front hitch to the center of
the wheels is 67.3% of trailer length. One slide out is over the wheels but the other opposing slide is about
50% forward of the wheels. The first three seasons towing had completely ruined the WD feature of the model
1000 Equal-i-zer and then installed Timbrens to fix the rear end sag. The sway feature was unaffected.
After reading these threads, I have visually inspected my OEM and looks o.k. but went ahead and ordered the Curt.
Tom
The OP has a 2015 with an OEM Class V rated for 1,800/18,000. It appears that is WD or WC as there is no mention of a difference in any of the Ram documentation.
I couldn't find this info anywhere. Good news for sure.
As for your desire to upgrade I would consider a hitch that replaces the OEM in the OEM location instead of going under it. The ones that go under like to drag on things and just look like a cheap fix. Removing the OEM isn't difficult. I went with the Titan #45299 hitch and had the 2" sleeve welded in. It was the only hitch I could find, at the time, that used the OEM holes and additional frame mounts, as well as replaced the OEM. The curt's look cheap and anemic compared to the Titan or OEM.
https://www.etrailer.com/Trailer-Hitch/Draw-Tite/DT45509.html
Dasmoeturhead. No doubt you have enough truck for a 8,000 lb trailer wet. What concerns me is the stock
class IV receiver hitch rating. From what I have gathered from TDR and other forums is that the stock receiver
hitch is good for 500 lbs tongue and 10,000 lbs trailer directly on the ball with no help. Being that hindsight is 20-20,
it would be a good idea to weigh the tongue weight loaded before evaluating the hitch set up. I would say that
if the loaded tongue weight is greater than 500 lbs, then a WDH would increase the capacity about a hundred
pounds. The WDH hitch addition is a nice accessory no matter what. If your tongue weight is quite exsessive
I would suggest for peace of mind reasons, to consider a Class V receiver hitch with a 2" square tube.
Suspension Connection sells a Curt #15409 that mounts directly under the OEM, so you can have two
receivers or you can remove the OEM all together. Rated 17,000 lbs trailer and 2550 lbs tongue.
The reason I am replying is because I actually have enough truck too, even as a 2500 SW, and the trailer
is 7970 lbs wet. However the tongue weight is a whopping 1400 lbs! I don't know how to change the way we
load up in order to redistribute for better balance. We would have to empty all the front bedroom closets
and empty out the pots and pans and drawers in the kitchen and stuff everything in the back every time
we go out. That's not going to happen. I consider our loading as a typical. Wouldn't a trailer mfg consider
typical loading? Maybe the undercarriage has something to do with it. From the front hitch to the center of
the wheels is 67.3% of trailer length. One slide out is over the wheels but the other opposing slide is about
50% forward of the wheels. The first three seasons towing had completely ruined the WD feature of the model
1000 Equal-i-zer and then installed Timbrens to fix the rear end sag. The sway feature was unaffected.
After reading these threads, I have visually inspected my OEM and looks o.k. but went ahead and ordered the Curt.
Tom