Lawsuit filed against DC

[BCFAST]

Well, more reason to comfy with DC... a Viginia-based consumer advocasy group has joined with plaintiffs in North Carolina against DC for selling vehicles it bought back thru lemon law, without telling the new buyers what they were getting. Chrysler buys back around 100,000 vehicles a year under lemon law, and resells 95% of them back to dealers. According to DC, the dealers are supposed to disclose the lemon history of the vehicle to the consumer... the vehicles are sold as 'used'. Found this on Speedvision.com .

 

[Bad340fish]

Thats what 99% of all the Dakota R/Ts are. They were bought back due to a decrease in tow rating. Went from like 6500 to 2000 due to the lowered stance i think. A friend of mine had his for over a year and they paid for his tag and everything. A friend of my dad had one sold it back, went to the dealer and bought one just like his with lower mileage lol. Wierd deal
Clark

 

[Tom C]

BCFAST, When I was first looking for a cummins dodge I found a used one at a dealer identical to yours (not yours though #ad
). I think it had tan interior. anyway... I drove it, picked at it, crawled under it and wheeled and dealed a low price. I though great I got me a truck. then all of a sudden I heard the magical words as they were scrowling through the papers "and this peace of paper says its a factory buy back ". I stopped them right there and said "factory what?". they said ow ye a factory buy back. the previous owner complained about a shimmy in the steering wheel. so dodge bought it back cause they did not like it and that all they had to do was put new set of calipers on it. It was a good thing i was paying attention because they tried getting that paper by me real fast. End of story is - I gave them a few choice word about lemon laws and then left and have never been back to that dealer. acually I did ask them to keep there eye out for a used truck for me. I never got a call back. I wander why?? #ad