I agree with Gary on this. I don't see the "reward" part of the risk/reward clutchless shifting equation.Gary - K7GLD said:To each his own - but personally, I supect the "no clutch shifting" is sort of a mix of laziness and being macho, otherwise, what's the point...
Sure, you might get away with it for a while, but there is most definitely added stress on the syncros using that method over the long haul - and a single careless moment MIGHT end up being pretty costly and inconvenient!
No offense intended to those preferring that method - but I guess I'll stick with the wimpout method, and get the value outta that fancy clutch I recently installed...![]()
![]()
Gary - K7GLD said:To each his own - but personally, I supect the "no clutch shifting" is sort of a mix of laziness and being macho, otherwise, what's the point...
Sure, you might get away with it for a while, but there is most definitely added stress on the syncros using that method over the long haul - and a single careless moment MIGHT end up being pretty costly and inconvenient!
No offense intended to those preferring that method - but I guess I'll stick with the wimpout method, and get the value outta that fancy clutch I recently installed...![]()
![]()