Hoping for some ultra-low-flame rational thinking here 
I'm new to this diesel-rig, thing, so may be coming from a different planet, but I have a question about the eagerness some show to get their hands, tools, and whatever latest gadget someone offers, on their brand new truck.
Anatomy "issues" and hormone levels aside, along with whether smoke and noise are good things or bad, I'm curious as to whether or not the improvements intended for the machine that the Cummins engineers have given us come at some unacknowledged or undiscovered cost. (or are those costs simply ignored as un-important to the particular owner)
Most all design involves unavoidable compromise,... with something lost for something else gained,... and the guys that have spent years evolving the CTD to this particular state of the art are not slouches. Maybe they have even done a better job than Joe Shadetree could have whipped up in his backyard.
No offense to Joe intended, and I realize that many modders are very well equipped and quite knowledgable.
But I wouldn't bet money on their coming up with a better all-round package than Cummins can do/has done.
More than once, when I have had a chance to ask a designer about some design aspect that made no sense to me, I received an explanation that made very good sense of things after all. I think of this whenever I hear "Tear that damn thing off!" "Defeat this!" or "Replace that!".
Is it generally agreed that Cummins has done an excellent job, but some are after "more" in specific areas, and are willing to pay more to get it,... whereas it would not be profitable for Cummins to offer the same to the general user-public?
Or is there a lot of "My cup isn't full enough 'till it runneth over more than yours(... and makes a bigger fuss doing it)!" feeling behind this?
I'd be very interested in some discussion about the motivation, goals, and proven accomplishments of "The Modifier People" , and what any real trade-offs, in other performance factors, durability, environmental effects, etc. , are.
Thanks for any thoughts on this.

I'm new to this diesel-rig, thing, so may be coming from a different planet, but I have a question about the eagerness some show to get their hands, tools, and whatever latest gadget someone offers, on their brand new truck.
Anatomy "issues" and hormone levels aside, along with whether smoke and noise are good things or bad, I'm curious as to whether or not the improvements intended for the machine that the Cummins engineers have given us come at some unacknowledged or undiscovered cost. (or are those costs simply ignored as un-important to the particular owner)
Most all design involves unavoidable compromise,... with something lost for something else gained,... and the guys that have spent years evolving the CTD to this particular state of the art are not slouches. Maybe they have even done a better job than Joe Shadetree could have whipped up in his backyard.
No offense to Joe intended, and I realize that many modders are very well equipped and quite knowledgable.
But I wouldn't bet money on their coming up with a better all-round package than Cummins can do/has done.
More than once, when I have had a chance to ask a designer about some design aspect that made no sense to me, I received an explanation that made very good sense of things after all. I think of this whenever I hear "Tear that damn thing off!" "Defeat this!" or "Replace that!".
Is it generally agreed that Cummins has done an excellent job, but some are after "more" in specific areas, and are willing to pay more to get it,... whereas it would not be profitable for Cummins to offer the same to the general user-public?
Or is there a lot of "My cup isn't full enough 'till it runneth over more than yours(... and makes a bigger fuss doing it)!" feeling behind this?
I'd be very interested in some discussion about the motivation, goals, and proven accomplishments of "The Modifier People" , and what any real trade-offs, in other performance factors, durability, environmental effects, etc. , are.
Thanks for any thoughts on this.
