More testing, changes, etc:
Since a couple of weeks ago I took off the fuel cooler up front behind the front receiver hitch (it was sloshing really badly), added a (home made) fuel cooler in front of the A/C core, and moved the inline fuel filter to where the old fuel cooler was (the frame mount was too hard to change the inline filter, too burried under lines etc).
Net result:
At slow speeds (1400 rpm, 51 mph) I got rid of 5* in the VP EBC. VP EBC went from OAT +15* to OAT + 10*, the fuel temp went from OAT +10* to OAT + 8* (more fuel cooler up front). The EBC delta above the fuel temp went from +5* to +2*.
At highway speed (1800 rpm, 65 mph) I got rid of 10* in the VP EBC. VP EBC went from OAT +25* to OAT +15*, the fuel temp went from OAT +15* to OAT +10* (more fuel cooler up front and more ram air). The EBC delta above the fuel temp went from +10* to +5*.
Observations:
The tube cooler (home made, fits infront of the A/C core, 6 horizontal tubes, full width of the A/C core) is only effective at speeds of 45 mph or greater. Seems the ram air at in town speeds is insufficient to have any effect.
Next testing:
My next and probably final test will be to reduce the VP input fuel psi from 17# to 14#. The old thread of "pumps, lines, and whatnot" Bill K indicated as he raised VP input psi the temp of the tank return fuel went up. I am going to try to precisely match the input psi at normal cruise speeds (55+ mph) to the Bosch specs of 14 psi and see what effect that has on the VP EBC temp.
Results:
I am generally pleased with the fuel cooler design and installation. All it is, is 1/2" hard copper "type M" (thick wall) tubing soldered together with appropriate 90*'s and T's. The 6 horizontal tubes are spaced veritcally 4" apart. The side to side is 23" so a "d" clamp (with rubber insert) can be screwed into the A/C core mounting bracket with the existing screws in the existing places go around the 1/2" tubing and be protected by the rubber insert. I also used the air dam 6 x 1. 00 torx screws as the "d" mount at the bottom on each side. Simple and effective secure mounting without adding any mounting brackets. I have a pic in the digital camera and will get it posted in a day or so.
I now have the VP EBC down to OAT +10* to +15*. The VP EBC temp follows exactely with fuel temp +2* at 1400 rpm, and fuel temp + 5* at 1800 rpm. It is so obvious now that the VP temp is based on rpm pure and simple. Of course fuel input temp plays a role, but with same fuel input temp, vary the rpm's and you will vary the EBC temp directly.
The last test (is there EVER a LAST?) will be to match the VP input pressure precisely so as to not generate any heat from that mismatch.
A really LAST test will be to cool the tank return fuel with some sort of a passive cooler.
I want to see how the psi matching does with the VP EBC temps first though. I also want to drive the fuel cooler up front configuration through a couple of tanks to verify that low tank levels do not change its effectiveness.
For you northern guys, I also made a simple front cooler bypass, so when you do not want to cool the fuel, just bypass the cooler. Easy 1 minute, 2 coupling changes and "no fuel cooling". You could use a winter front as well to do the same job. I think if you used a winter front you might actually capture the heat off the engine to warm the fuel. You would have to test that on your own.
I'll do another post after a couple of tanks of fuel to see what the long term effects are. However I think this is getting real close to keeping the VP44 nice and cool. (In the Bosch book in the other thread some of the tolerances of the VP44 are . 1 um. That's really small!, I would think cool fuel will lubricate better than hot fuel, not to mention to keep the EBC in a better temp range)
Bob Weis