Attention: TDR Forum Junkies 
This was ment to be a reply to STICKS post about tourqe . . doh... bed time!
I think tourqe values must be variable, and if you look at the rateings for the last 15 years we are getting a smaller and smaller ratio
1989 160hp/400 2. 5
1995 160hp/420 2. 6
1997 215/440 2. 0
2000 235/460 1. 9
2003 305/555 1. 8
dmax 300/520 1. 7
ford 6. 0 325/560 1. 7
so. . anyway. . not that any of this make sense
numbers I got off the internet
Jim
I think tourqe values must be variable, and if you look at the rateings for the last 15 years we are getting a smaller and smaller ratio
1989 160hp/400 2. 5
1995 160hp/420 2. 6
1997 215/440 2. 0
2000 235/460 1. 9
2003 305/555 1. 8
dmax 300/520 1. 7
ford 6. 0 325/560 1. 7
so. . anyway. . not that any of this make sense
numbers I got off the internet
Jim
