I'm working with Bullydog directly in conjunction with the box article. So if we can please keep the hype down and the facts up that would be great. I expect there will be some attractive features to a downloader, so I'll be sorting out fact from fiction on that. For example, a downloader is a risk in that it could either corrupt the factory programming or leave a timestamp or trail that can be followed or detected. But I know Bullydog is working on all these issues and won't release until they have a solid product. I sure wouldn't let a downloader insert code into *MY* ECM without a clear understanding of what it does.
As with any new product intro, we need to try and avoid the sensationalism and concentrate on the facts. In particular, pre-release or beta test products are not the most reliable for test reports, because they may or may not represent what will actually ship. I dont' want Bullydog to get a bad rap here due to over sensationalizing, nor do I want preliminary test results to be any different from what will be released to the public. no I'm no moderator; just trying to preserve objectivity.
Also, here on edit: just a word of advice. the respected suppliers and retailers and distributors here on this board make their affiliation known without the appearance of a hidden agenda. So thanks indeed for clearing that up.