Timbeaux38 said:
Now that's smoking a chubby, Pun intended.

Timbeaux38 said:
ob1kobi said:This is great to hear. I get tired of all the bs about electronic gurus making custom 4 stage one off systems and how everything has to be so technical. 1020 to the ground, not an engine dyno, and in a street truck, now thats what I am talking about!
The common dyno correction factors give totally bogus results when applied to boosted engines here at high altitude. We have one dyno operator that gives his customers dyno corrected hp numbers with a correction factor of 1. 22 - 1. 25.
When I looked into it, it appears he is in good faith using the SAE J1349 correction (or something very close to it, provided by the dyno manufacturer). But all the serious players up here know the numbers are silly. Another Dyno operation applies a flat 1. 15 correction with no atmospheric correction applied.
As a result you can get stock cars that correct to higher than manufactures rated hp at sea level. Source
Chassis dynos are pretty hillbilly compared to engine dynos.
Amish Elegance said:Your opinion does not surprise me, seeing as you OWN AN ENGINE DYNO!!Regardless, the guy's making great power and he's getting it to the ground. Pat him on the back and start your own thread about dynos.
... you may even get some business if you go about it right.
JLackman said:With a mind set like that I'd never see him as a customer anyway.
massdiesel said:The truck is in decent shape it was one of our customers plow trucks up til 2 years ago from here in the northeast.