I know I'm a skeptic - but I really feel oil marketers use EXACTLY the tests that will make THEIR brand look better than the competition - Amsoil wallows in that famous "4-ball test" - others use their own selection that you can BET is used precisely BECAUSE it makes theirs LOOK better than the others.
If YOU dyno your truck 3 times in a row, making no changes to the engine during the process - and get 3 different maximum readings for each, WHICH one will you post here as the HP of your truck?
OR, if you dyno on 3 DIFFERENT dynos in a relatively short period of time - with widely varying maximum power results, which one will YOU use to brag about your truck's performance?
IF an oil refiner, synthetic or dino, sends out their product to a dozen different analyzers for testing, and gets varying results back, which result do ya suppose they will crow about in their advertising, the BEST one - or one of the mediocre ones - and will they even ADMIT to using other testers than the one they loudly brag about?
It's all about marketing hype, smoke and mirrors, and sleigh-of-hand. Pretty much ALL the latest name-brand oils, synthetic or otherwise, are truly great oils - but take these various "proofs of excellence" with a grain of salt - I seriously doubt they are actually worth the paper they're printed on as far as actual PROOF that one is significantly "better" than another!
As a point of fact, all the LONGEST running, documented trucks that have appeared on THIS site, have been using plain old standard dino oils like Rotella and Chevron - and have racked up over a MILLION miles on those oils, regardless of how "inferior" various tests might have "proved" them to be...
My . 02 cents worth...