There were some interesting points made in some of those editorials. That the SUV burning "environmentalist" could be considered terrorists. - Well I agree, they "enviro terrorist" are terrorists. Some of the things they do- Burn down a dealership in LA and burn SUV's. Creating more pollution in one day than the entire dealer lot would have made in thier engineered life. People removing bolts from transmission towers, breaking into substations and trying to cause blackouts, Greenpeace invading foriegn nuclear facilities ( not done here-I would like to see the anti nukes test the security- the more the better-we will inform thier next of kin), sabotaging ships, taking up rails, putting spikes in trees, putting tire spikes in logging roads ( thats OK the logging companies will just use tracked vehicles instead of very low pressure tires- that should make them happy). They are terrorist acts. When someone dies as the result of the derailment, chainsaw chain snapping, electical blackout, smoke inhalation of the fire fighters, the floor cleaner at the abortion clinic- then they are murderers and terrorists. Ohh but they are doing it for the "good of the nation"
in thier own heartfelt opinion- Death row is full of people that believe they made society better by murdering " vicims name here ", those victims deserved to die. I have no problem having someone fry that kills a firefighter due to thier "Ecoterrorism/ arson" Or at least rot next to "Bubba" never having a day of rectal continance for the rest of thier life. If you harbor the sniper that kills an abortion doctor, or give money to someone that buys gasoline to cause arson and you know what it is for- Rot right next to them. I have no problem with that. What is the ACLU so scared of? Robbing a liquor store is roberry, burning SUV dealers is not criminal michief and arson- it is terrorism by arson- designed to terrorize insurance companies not to cover SUV's, or dealers trying to change our policies through fear- Terrorism.
Attention: TDR Forum Junkies 
