Poor ISP/cable/telephone service?

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

How some people become smart and rich....

PowerWagon (Mark), Doc Tinker (David) ?

If you've ever been frustrated by trying to get technical support when

things are not going right with your internet service or installation,

you are not alone. None of us are. I guess they have similar

problems in Britain. Here's a frustrated and angry Brit venting his anger:

Actual British complaint letter. The piece suggests two things:

1) Americans and Canadians are not the only ones who get poor service

from their ISP, cable and/or alarm companies. (NTL is a cable operator

in Britain).

2) The Brits probably write the world's best letters of complaint.





Dear Cretins:



I have been an NTL customer since 9th July 2001, when I signed up for

your four-in-one deal for cable TV, cable modem, telephone, and alarm

monitoring. During this three-month period I have encountered inadequacy

of service which I had not previously considered possible, as well as

ignorance and stupidity of monolithic proportions. Please allow me to

provide specific details, so that you can either pursue your professional

prerogative and seek to rectify these difficulties -- or more likely (I

suspect) so that you can have some entertaining reading material as you

while away the working day smoking B&H and drinking vendor-coffee on

the bog in your office.



My initial installation was cancelled without warning, resulting in my

spending an entire Saturday sitting on my fat arse waiting for your

technician to arrive. When he did not arrive, I spent a further 57 minutes

listening to your infuriating hold music, and the even more annoying

Scottish robot woman telling me to look at your helpful website. HOW?



I alleviated the boredom by playing with my testicles for a few minutes

-- an activity at which you are no doubt both familiar and highly

adept. The rescheduled installation then took place some two weeks later,

although the technician did forget to bring a number of vital tools --

such as a drill-bit and his cerebrum. Two weeks later, my cable modem had

still not arrived. After 15 telephone calls over four weeks my modem

arrived, six weeks after I had requested it -- and begun to pay for it. I

estimate your internet server's downtime is roughly 35% -- the hours

between about 6 pm and midnight, Monday through Friday and most of the

weekend. I am still waiting for my telephone connection.



I have made nine calls on my mobile to your no-help line and have been

unhelpfully transferred to a variety of disinterested individuals who

are, it seems, also highly skilled bollock jugglers. I have been

informed that a telephone line is available (and someone will call me back);

that I will be transferred to someone who knows whether or not a

telephone line is available (and then been cut off); that I will be

transferred to someone (and then been redirected to an answering machine

informing me that your office is closed); that I will be transferred to

someone and then been redirected to the irritating Scottish robot woman. And several other variations on this theme.



Doubtless you are no longer reading this letter, as you have at least a

thousand other dissatisfied customers to ignore and also another one of

those crucially important testicle moments to attend to. Frankly I

don't care. It's far more satisfying as a customer to voice my frustrations

in print than to shout them at your unending hold music.



Forgive me, therefore, if I continue. I thought British Telecom was crap; that they had attained the holy ****-pot of god-awful customer relations; and that

no one, anywhere, ever, could be more disinterested, less helpful or

more obstructive to delivering service to their customers That's why I

chose NT and because, well, there isn't anyone else is there?



How surprised I therefore was when I discovered to my considerable

dissatisfaction and disappointment what a useless shower of *******s you

truly are. You are sputum-filled pieces of distended rectum, incompetents

of the highest order. BT -- wankers though they are -- shine like

brilliant beacons of success in the filthy mire of your seemingly limitless

inadequacy.



Suffice to say that I have now given up on my futile and foolhardy

quest to receive any kind of service from you. I suggest that you cease any

potential future attempts to extort payment from me for the services

which you have so pointedly and catastrophically failed to deliver. Any

such activity will be greeted initially with hilarity and disbelief and

will quickly be replaced by derision and even perhaps bemused rage.



I enclose two small deposits, selected with great care from my cat's

litter tray, as an expression of my utter and complete contempt for both

you and your pointless company. I sincerely hope that they have not

become desiccated during transit -- they were satisfyingly moist at the

time of posting, and I would feel considerable disappointment if you did

not experience both their rich aroma and delicate texture. Consider

them the very embodiment of my feelings towards NTL and its worthless

employees.



Have a nice day. May it be the last in your miserable short lives, you

irritatingly incompetent and infuriatingly unhelpful bunch of *******s!

May you rot in Hell, Robert Stokes
 
Wow, that is rough. I have had problems with Verizon, but never anything that bad.



Not too long ago (about two years) we changed Internet Service Providers at work from Verizon (left because service sucked) and switched to Light Stream (Fiber Provider in Pittsburgh); best switch we ever made.



Here is the story, after we changed IP addresses, somewhere in Verizon's DNS servers (141. 151. 0. 39, 141. 151. 0. 38, 151. 201. 0. 39, 151. 201. 0. 38) they have set the DNS cache to either never expire, or at least it does not scavenge records for a very long time (like 6 months). So, any Verizon customer (at least any body using the aforementioned DNS servers) was getting a name resolution to our old Verizon IP addresses, and not to our new IP addresses. After many failed call attempts, a threat of legal action finally got Verizon to delete these stale records from their DNS cache.





I had a similar problem with their DSL service. Here in Pgh, they, just like anywhere else, issue your DSL IP address from a DHCP pool (I am too cheep to buy a static IP address). Recently, they added new IP addresses into the Pool, creating a new scope. Unfortunately, when they created this new scope, they forgot to configure dynamic DNS updates for both forward (aHost) and reverse (PTR) name resolution (they just did not create the reverse lookup for this scope). When you would be issued a new IP address, only the aHost would update. This would stop me from checking my mail at work, because unlike most system administrators, I set up my mail server correctly. It requires both a aHost incoming connection and a reverse lookup to aid in verification of who is sending the mail (to aid in stopping spoofing). Verizon's E-Mail servers do not require both forward and reverse lookup authentication, they require only forward lookup authentication.



After calling Verizon Help and Support and explaining the problem, (I could not connect to my mail server, Sendmail on Solaris 5. 9), they answered by saying my Verizon E-Mail was working correctly and there was not a problem with E-Mail or with Verizon's Network. I said, I know it is not a problem with my Verizon E-Mail, it is a DNS problem with your network causing an issue with my network.



After realizing that was useless, a quick long-distance call to the owner of the aforementioned DNS servers, explaining the situation to them, I throughly confused the tech who answered the phone and he passed me to a Network Engineer. After 15 min of talking to the Engineer, he realized what the problem was and fixed the DNS entries on the BIND server (created the reverse lookup zone for the addresses and allowed dynamic updates). No problems since.
 
i have rogers cable internet here, and it is suppose to be high speed... for shats and giggles, i'll run an internet speed test every so often, and it it is just great when it comes back with your connection speed is less than 14. 4k dialup... :rolleyes:



when we first got it, it was fast as heck [we were one of the first in the community to get cable internet] and now everyone's got it and it is slow... i can click a link, go make a sandwich, eat it, and come back and sometimes it hasn't loaded :mad:
 
Back
Top