Here I am

Puget Sound air pollution

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

California “anti-motorist” Bill

Potential new member...need help!

SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/70516_pollution15ww.shtml



Study confirms Puget Sound air pollution among nation's worst

Wednesday, May 15, 2002



By LUIS CABRERA

ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER



A study released Wednesday confirms that air in the Puget Sound area is among the nation's worst for levels of diesel soot, a major contributor to cancer risk.



The study, released by the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, estimates that 550 in 1 million people would develop lung cancer over a 70-year life span from exposure to burning diesel fuel in the greater Seattle area.



A total of nearly 700 in 1 million would be expected to develop cancer from exposure to diesel and some 30 other pollutants measured in the study.



The study confirms a 1996 federal report that showed King, Snohomish, Pierce and Kitsap counties are in the 90th percentile or above for levels of chemicals emitted by the burning of diesel fuel in semi-trucks and other vehicles, Clean Air Agency Director Dennis McLerran said.



The agency was skeptical at first when the federal Environmental Protection Agency ranked the area's air pollution with cities such as Los Angeles and Houston, McLerran said.



However, the study released Wednesday of monitoring at six Seattle-area sites shows the federal figures "were quite accurate," he said.



He noted that diesel fuel puts out as much as 40 percent more pollutants than standard gasoline.



"We're a a port city," McLerran said of Seattle. "We have a lot of diesel truck traffic in and out of the port, rail traffic, ships coming in and out. We're a major trade center and major trade centers have concentrations of diesel vehicles. "



The study estimates that between 70 percent and 85 percent of cancer risk in the region comes from diesel fuel. Standard gasoline emissions remain a concern, McLerran said, but cars, unlike diesel vehicles, are required to have catalytic converters and other pollution-reducing devices.



Data came from six months of monitoring for pollutants at six King County sites: Beacon Hill, Georgetown and Maple Leaf in Seattle; suburban Lake Sammamish east of the city, Lake Forest Park to the north and Seatac to the south.



Models were used to estimate pollutants in the other three counties, and their levels were consistent with those measured in King County, McLerran said.



"What this study identifies is we have an identifiable cancer risk in all four of our urban counties," he said.



"What we really need is for our school districts and local governments and large (diesel) fleet owners to begin to address these risks. "



Diesel emissions can be significantly reduced, McLerran said, through retrofitting diesel vehicles with new exhaust systems that can burn cleaner diesel fuel.



"A local government, by purchasing this cleaner fuel and retrofitting its fleet, can clean up its fleet by 90 to 95 percent," he said.



The Clean Air Agency is working with officials in Seattle, King County, Everett and other local governments to encourage retrofitting of buses and staff fleet cars, McLerran said.



It also is reaching out to private shipping and other companies to encourage them to retrofit ahead of a federal program scheduled to begin within four years.



"Our goal is to reach 50 percent of public fleets over next five years and 30 percent of private fleets," he said, adding that diesel school bus fleets were a particular concern.



He noted that other high-pollution areas such as Los Angeles and Boston have imposed more stringent requirements on diesel fuel. In Los Angeles, for example, requirements are in place for exhaust retrofitting and burning the cleaner fuel in fleets. In Boston, construction companies are required to retrofit their vehicles.



© 1998-2002 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What a bunch of crap:mad:



If they only new:-{}



So how come Seattle is the only place they are making such a big deal out of it?:confused: There are lots of port barring cities.
 
Soot causing cancer = BS

Recently I looked around the web and couldn't find any credible studies actually showing where diesel soot is a major contributor to cancer risk. If anyone can find such a thing I'd like to see it. I know recently CARB declared diesel soot as a toxin or harmful pollutant or something of that nature but I don't know what sort of study/research it was based on.



I did find a report done in '98 or '99 that evaluated and summarized research and studies done on the effects of diesel soot and it concluded there is no clear evidence at all that soot contributes to cancer risk. It commented on studies done on rats and mice and found even with super concentrated exposure to diesel soot, the animals did not develop anything other than nonmalignant tumors in the lungs. It had no effect on any other organs. If I can I will see if I can dig it up again.



I thought the big discussion on diesel soot was it caused asthma. Now it is cancer. It seems the libs are just looking for a problem to associate with diesel exhaust just to get rid of it.



Vaughn
 
WOW I found the article. . . search function works great! :)



Link http://www.dieselnet.com/papers/9710nauss.html



My summary





--There is a lack of real good data to clearly indicate there are any significant health affects from diesel exhaust

--Diesel exhaust has changed a lot over the last couple of decades and continues to change which makes it very difficult to analyze health effects of diesel emissions.

--In the early '80s in the LA area only 3% of the total particulate matter in the air was the result of diesel exhaust. [as diesel power has increased in popularity and gasser emissions have dropped, this % number has gone up considerably since 1980]

--The article discusses studies done on animals (rats, mice, etc. ) While some developed tumors when exposed to very highly elevated exposure to diesel soot, others did not. Also, the lungs were the only organ affected by the soot.

--The article suggested these animal studies are extrapolated to mean diesel exhaust is harmful in humans.



IMHO, exposure to diesel soot poses less of a risk than walking outside and having a little sunshine hit you on the skin :rolleyes:



Vaughn
 
Huh???

These people that do these studies must get paid big time just to promote their beliefs. "550 out of 1 million people would develop lung cancer over a 70 year life span from exposure to burning diesel fuel in the greater seattle area"... that figures out to be . 05% of 1 million people... Wow, better stop all the buses/trucks and anything running on diesel and save that 550 lives so they can live another 5-15 years! What a joke... wonder what the number of people that die from getting in an accident from some idiot talking on the cell phone and driving at the same time? I wonder what the number of people die from improperly inflated tires causing accidents? Either way you look at it, people will die from something... no matter what, you will die... either from a head injury or cancer or just old age... this "puget sound clean air agency" is just clawing at anything they can get their hands on to say "Hey... look, we better stop this so we can increase the life span of 550 people" Stupid... just plain stupid
 
Remember, every government agency must continue to justify itself, right or wrong, in order to survive and grow. Bureaucracy, The cancer of society!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top