Queen Hillary

[baby.driver]

Don M

Your word play is truly... . Truly!



Jay

 

[Don M]

No I dont apply it to all women. My application of "enabler" is not from "a" as in singular, affair. There were many and will be many more to come if the 'bent one' does not wilt from impotence or a disease.



Lets not forget the others besides Monica.



I have no close relationship with her for obvious reasons. She does not remain married to Bill for anything more than power.



Don~







No, I dont hate Dubya either.

 

[Lhotka]

Hillary was not the first, and won't be the last person to marry someone who is politically or financially connected. Remaining married for political gain seems almost trivial if one compares it to other actions taken by elected officials.

 

[Deezul1]

The person holding any political title is not automatically deserving respect. That must be earned through moral and ethical behavior. The office is something each person elected needs to live up to and if they fail then they get no respect from me or anyone else I know and it seems the Clintons have failed to live up to the honor that each office deserves.

 

[Don M]

She has no choice

She lacks the physical or emotional characteristics to attract anyone with in the pool of traditional male suitors.

She has the added burden of having painted herself into a corner with advanced educational degrees combined with the umwillingness to "marry down".

That causes additional stress in pair bonding, and an excuse for dabbling in "alternative" lifestyles. There is NOTHING genetic about lesbianism but perhaps some unfortunate physical characteristics which cause a militantly defensive lifestyle. [You want to see hate? Just listen to a bunch of lesbians dissing a recidivist femme]



Not calling her a lesbian, but there are parallels to be drawn from her actions.

Women have always had a civilizing influence on the sexual appetites of men -- defining the terms under which men contract for a steady supply of monogamous sex. Absent the female influence from Hillary- Billy has become the equivalent of a feral animal.



Don~

 

[Forrest]

Not a chance ... that is what I thought about the 2nd term. Bush hands the White house over to Clinton, who hands it over to Bush, who hands it over to ... Clinton?



All the adjectives above are accurate IMO, but there were more, worse ones prior to the 2nd term & look what happened. All she has to do is campaign to the same groups. Aren't they still there?

 

[Sled Puller]

Can Hillary WIN?



No.



Can she STEAL an election?

Absolutely.

Look how close Gore came to stealing it. She won't make the same mistakes.



Especially after the American people let them get away with all the crap they did.

Did any of those college students get prosecuted for voting several times?



Did the dems get busted for buying votes with cigs to the homeless?



Did the Black republicans whose votes were "LOST" in Florida ever get taken of?



No,no,no.

 

[Lhotka]

Re: She has no choice

Originally posted by Don M

She lacks the physical or emotional characteristics to attract anyone with in the pool of traditional male suitors.

She has the added burden of having painted herself into a corner with advanced educational degrees combined with the umwillingness to "marry down".

That causes additional stress in pair bonding, and an excuse for dabbling in "alternative" lifestyles. There is NOTHING genetic about lesbianism but perhaps some unfortunate physical characteristics which cause a militantly defensive lifestyle. [You want to see hate? Just listen to a bunch of lesbians dissing a recidivist femme]



Not calling her a lesbian, but there are parallels to be drawn from her actions.

Women have always had a civilizing influence on the sexual appetites of men -- defining the terms under which men contract for a steady supply of monogamous sex. Absent the female influence from Hillary- Billy has become the equivalent of a feral animal.



Don~

So if I understand the last paragraph of your above statement correctly and you're consistent in the application of this theory, you imply that Mayor Rudolph Giuliani and Newt Gingrich have become feral animals. Right? Apply this to what Deezul 1 stated here. "The person holding ANY political title is not automatically deserving respect. That must be earned through moral and ethical behavior.

 

[Don M]

hypocrisy....its a useful tool

Lhotka,



Many on the left lack the skills of discernment.

You dont have to apply equal treatment to everyone 'just because' Lhotka.

This is a basic disagreement between the Red and Blue states.



The left side genrally cannot apply hypocrisy and use it as a tool.

Some of us who fly down the road at over 90 MPH in a bombed Cummins truck would likely be uncomfortable at the idea of a teenage kid doing the same thing. Yes, its hypocrisy- but NOT unreasonable upon reflection.



Don~

 

[Lhotka]

Don,



I don't fault you for giving way to what is predictable human behavior. It is common to stray away from the argument and focus on the person presenting an opposing argument when you not longer can defend your position.



Thanks for the debate!!!!

 

[Don M]

I stated the reason I would use hypocrisy in this case. I did defend my position.

Some of the unfaithful are truly sorry for their mistakes while others are not.

'Just because' Rudy was unfaithful does not mean he earns the title of feral animal.

For Billy it is a way of life, not a mistake.



Feral animal and hyena are the best descriptors for these two.



I submit: Billy has led and continues to lead a lifestyle much like a feral animal.



Don~



sorry for the poke.

I retract it