Disclaimer;
I have never been a LEO, No one in my family is or has been since my pternal grandfather who died many years before I was born. (actually he was a U. S. Marshall in the Indian Territory--"True Grit" :>).
But with 30+ years on the bench trying cases---probably on the order 60% criminal--I have had a whole lot of cop watching. In a fair number of cases, there is a controversy about the conduct of the people involved, including that of the officers involved.
Rules;
There some bad apples in every barrell-----whether its a barrell of preahers, doctors, plumbers or schoold teachers, therefor there are some bad officers.
Everyone will accasionally have a bad day and fail to measure up to what they ordinarilly are.
That all said, I have manytimes been impressed by the responsibility, restraint and concern exhibited by officers in bad or trying situations; on a very few occasions I have been disapointed in conduct of officers, on twoccasions, I initiated action that resulted in officers being disciplined and on one occasion, removed from the Oregon State Police.
The number of officers who willfully disregard the law or unduly take advantage of their situation, is, at least in Oregon, too small to be of any concern.
In vertually every situation where I have encountered a "cop hating" attitude, the cause lay in the conduct/history of the person involved---not in that of officers. The one clear example that comes to mind is that of a former deputy prosecutor who became very anti- cop. I did some inquiry in the county where he used to practice and found that inspite of his former position, the cop who stopped him for bad driving went ahead and arrested him and he was convicted of DUI; now he hates cops.
The only real criticisms I have of officers as a group is there is a small tendency to develope an "us them" attitude, but I guess with the frequent negative attitude they see that might be to be expected. The other criticism I would make is that too many officers get over excited when they see or think there is a gun on or near a person they stop, when they have no reason to believe they they are encountering other than regular person.
Sorry this is so long and I have no time to proof read---my fingers and my brain often differ on which key "we" are hitting.
Vaughn
I have never been a LEO, No one in my family is or has been since my pternal grandfather who died many years before I was born. (actually he was a U. S. Marshall in the Indian Territory--"True Grit" :>).
But with 30+ years on the bench trying cases---probably on the order 60% criminal--I have had a whole lot of cop watching. In a fair number of cases, there is a controversy about the conduct of the people involved, including that of the officers involved.
Rules;
There some bad apples in every barrell-----whether its a barrell of preahers, doctors, plumbers or schoold teachers, therefor there are some bad officers.
Everyone will accasionally have a bad day and fail to measure up to what they ordinarilly are.
That all said, I have manytimes been impressed by the responsibility, restraint and concern exhibited by officers in bad or trying situations; on a very few occasions I have been disapointed in conduct of officers, on twoccasions, I initiated action that resulted in officers being disciplined and on one occasion, removed from the Oregon State Police.
The number of officers who willfully disregard the law or unduly take advantage of their situation, is, at least in Oregon, too small to be of any concern.
In vertually every situation where I have encountered a "cop hating" attitude, the cause lay in the conduct/history of the person involved---not in that of officers. The one clear example that comes to mind is that of a former deputy prosecutor who became very anti- cop. I did some inquiry in the county where he used to practice and found that inspite of his former position, the cop who stopped him for bad driving went ahead and arrested him and he was convicted of DUI; now he hates cops.
The only real criticisms I have of officers as a group is there is a small tendency to develope an "us them" attitude, but I guess with the frequent negative attitude they see that might be to be expected. The other criticism I would make is that too many officers get over excited when they see or think there is a gun on or near a person they stop, when they have no reason to believe they they are encountering other than regular person.
Sorry this is so long and I have no time to proof read---my fingers and my brain often differ on which key "we" are hitting.
Vaughn