Here I am

Schur Ecofuel

Attention: TDR Forum Junkies
To the point: Click this link and check out the Front Page News story(ies) where we are tracking the introduction of the 2025 Ram HD trucks.

Thanks, TDR Staff

Were is bio diesel sold??

Canola for Biodiesel

John,



Thanks for writing. I became bold enough to try something besides biodiesel in part by reading what cj (see his posts in this forum, in the DSE thread) had done. From there, I read everything I could find on the net - even outside the US, which is where I found the info from Schur.



I don't really have a problem with glycerin - it burns just fine. The motivation associated with it seems mostly to do with it's tendency to thicken the fuel and the issues that thick fuel brings. The biodiesel folks transesterify the oil to remove it, and the blenders thin it with gas/kerosene/alcohols... I chose the latter to keep the effort down, knowing I would be more likely to keep doing it that way.



The challenges with alternate fuel, for me, is *effort*. I knew that if I could get the process to the point where the time/labor component was low enough I would likely be able to sustain the use of the oil. I didn't need to spend a lot of money or get too fancy, but I don't have a lot of time so that part had to be reasonable. I think I've done OK, and have been blending and driving with the fuel since June.



Second and related is filtering the fuel. If you cannot accomplish a decent job at filtering the oil, the effort spent getting the fuel system going again on the vehicle would convince you to stop! It's not hard, but worth paying attention to. Since economics is a big driver, the cost of replacing failed fuel system parts, or even the engine, has to be considered. Sub-dollar fuel costs aren't cheap if balanced by $2k high-pressure pumps, injectors, or toasted engines. What I've found (reading), the experience of others such as cj (& myself) have led me to believe it can be done with reasonable safety for the rig.



Those things considered, finding a steady supply of quality used oil made the difference. I found a small local chain that provides 6-8 good 5-gal containers a week. Perfect for my driving; about 30 miles one way to work, which gives the engine plenty of time to warm up (a plus). The containers make pickup easy too; I know I'm fortunate in this, that both places put their used oil back into those cardboard housed, plastic containers.



The last item that helped with the Schur fuel was finding a recycler (circuit board manufacturing) who provided isopropyl alcohol at $3/gal. I'd be using DSE (just fine) otherwise.



So, until supply runs out or things change, I'm happily running the Cummins in my Suburban, getting 18-20 MPG in rural driving, and paying about $0. 60/gal for the blended fuel.



Regards,



Mark

--

JFaughn said:
I've not been a fan of the non ester proccess , manly becouse of the gliserin , and the heating of the fuel , to burn , not enough time to heat eng. & 30 gal, of fuel , during normal driving contitions ,

This seems to be making it sound better ,

But the powers that be , are making us go outside the counrty again , becouse they po-po anything that makes them share the $$$ ,

Thanks for the effort .
 
Don't let Champane Flight find out, :{ :{ he will be all over you guys, :-{} RUG in a diesel. I have done the gas in #2 myself and this is an interesting idea, has anyone tried it with WVO as apposed to SVO?
 
I use WVO, as does cj.



We could only wish we had as much quality control around the stuff we brew as CF and the oil industry. Of course, if we did, it would be #2... :cool:



Take care,



Mark

-



tgordon said:
Don't let Champane Flight find out, :{ :{ he will be all over you guys, :-{} RUG in a diesel. I have done the gas in #2 myself and this is an interesting idea, has anyone tried it with WVO as apposed to SVO?
 
Mark, great info. I've been on the sidelines for the past few years on alt fuel. One of the concerns I've had is carbonization (?) of the rings. I've read several studies from the early 80's in which many tests were unable to go full term (1,000 hours) due to carbon build up and engine damage.



With your and Mr. Halls efforts I'm starting to think I've been to consertative in my thinking. It looks like the blends make my concerns baseless.



Good luck, RJR
 
RJR,



Thanks.



As much as cj and I want to make this work, I have to acknowledge that the concerns many have *can be* legitimate. Folks like CF/Oil companies have to make a product that works all the time, under all conditions, in every vehicle. The manufacturers have to build the trucks to consume everything that meets spec, under all conditions that could be encountered.



What we, the alternative fuel adherents, don't really address strongly is the fact that the oil companies collective 'bar' is higher than ours when we do these "do it yourself" projects. As much as we like the results (so far) - it's not for everyone. We cannot all be as thorough as the fuel companies, so we can fall down or get blindsided if were not careful. We are more constrained by temperature, for example, and you can see cj and I accommodating the limitations of our fuel, and rigs not actually engineered for it, by adding heat (in his case), thinning more during the winter, using the block heater when it's cold, etc. etc.



We're quick to talk about the benefits, but to be honest it costs money to get set up, effort to sustain things, and compromises to deal with the reality of weather, supply, and the particular rigs/engines (e. g. cj runs a different % in his 04 than the 05 due to such differences).



We don't mind, of course, because we like the reduced cost, the challenge, feeling like we've accomplished something worthwhile - and all those other less tangible things.



So - as much as I believe we're going down a good path I have to admit it's not for everyone, and that the role played by the fuel industry is valuable/necessary (if not perfect!). Many will take the fuel at almost any price, or adjust consumption, because they're not up to what we're doing or don't have the time. That's Ok too!



My thoughts,



Mark

---





moparguy said:
Mark, great info. I've been on the sidelines for the past few years on alt fuel. One of the concerns I've had is carbonization (?) of the rings. I've read several studies from the early 80's in which many tests were unable to go full term (1,000 hours) due to carbon build up and engine damage.



With your and Mr. Halls efforts I'm starting to think I've been to consertative in my thinking. It looks like the blends make my concerns baseless.



Good luck, RJR
 
I haven't been able to read every post ,so bear with me , what I'm wondering is what is DSE ?
The world is full of snake oils , so when I go to use something , I want to know what it is , if I can not get informed than I wait to make a decision , I tryed some time ago to find out this when I 1st heard about it , but the web site in ? would not state what it was made of .
 
Regarding DSE,



It is a bottled product, but also comes with a formula for blended fuel - so you're really talking about blending (Vegoil, gas, kerosene, etc) with a "special sauce".



I know some folks have had the stuff analyzed, and there's been a lot of discussion on the vegoil forums about it. I'm not aware of anything terribly rigorous, scientifically, that's been published.



To the best of my knowledge, reading all the 'stuff' out there, DSE (bottled product) is a combination of solvents similar to Xylene (though, not simply that). Xylene works well on waxes, for example, and is something I've used over the years to dissolve candle wax on carpet. So DSE seems to rely on solvent qualities of whatever is in there, to resist wax forming and crystallization that happens at gel-point; allowing use at colder temps. cj lives in mid-Montana (I think) - and it gets real chilly there!



In the DSE thread in this forum, cj has actually done a significant amount of his own testing - a lot visible in the first few pages of his very healthy sized thread. I believe he's concluded that it helps, and continues to use the general formulation DSE describes (Vegoil, some kerosene, unleaded?, Power Service, and DSE)... you'd have to ask him, he's an experimenter.



I don't know if the measurable effect of the DSE 'product' you buy in the bottle is significant enough (cj could tell you), but the idea of blending to thin the fuel to better match the viscosity of #2 and lower the gel point is certainly worthwhile.



I initially used DSE and have since switched to the Schur formula - but both are similar blends for similar reasons with (so far, apparently) similar results.



Mark

-



JFaughn said:
I haven't been able to read every post ,so bear with me , what I'm wondering is what is DSE ?

The world is full of snake oils , so when I go to use something , I want to know what it is , if I can not get informed than I wait to make a decision , I tryed some time ago to find out this when I 1st heard about it , but the web site in ? would not state what it was made of .
 
Hello Everyone,



The temps around Portland OR / Vancouver WA area (I live about 1/2 hour north, NE of Battle Ground) hit in the 15F-19F range overnight. Last night I added enough WVO-mix to bring the mix up to a little more than 50% blend (balance #2 diesel).



Ran fine this AM (did have the block heater going). Started instantly - no smoke at all - the heater really helps that. Fuel pressure was normal at idle, but did pull a little less than 1psi lower during acceleration than I'm used to seeing. Given what I've seen with the new 15ppm fuel, it's more viscous than 500pm as far as I can tell, I can't say that the fuel pressure changed much with the added blend.



This is the coldest I've run the blended stuff - and I'm happy so far!



FYI - Mark
 
Hello Everyone,

As an update, I ran the truck in for emissions testing today; it's renewal time!

I don't know the criteria they used, possibly the '93 model year of the truck and its "under weight" (non-commercal?) status (3/4 ton GMC Suburban).

Anyhow, it was running about 75% blended oil and the balance #2.

Here in Washington State, they put the vehicle on a dyno and have us run it up to 25MPH under load, in 3rd gear.

It passed the test with 3% opacity; the maximum allowed is 20%.

So - that was a relatively painless way to be relieved of $15 and 8-10 minutes time.

Regards,

Mark
 
The ODO read 83,000 when I did the conversion, it just turned 113,000. I'm guessing 20-25k of that is on blend. I'd have to go back to the logs I kept at first to check the exact figures.

The oil analysis has been normal with 5k changes.

Thanks,

Mark
 
It would be interesting to contact some of the folks rebuilding CP3s and VP44s for performance, to see if they have any specific knowledge about what is good/bad for the pumps? I'd bet we could find a few in the competition forum?



I seem to recall a warning from Bosch about using any type of alcohol in a VP44. Something about de-lamination within the elctronics section of the pump. Can't remember were I got that (probably right here at TDR) but the photo that came with it was ugly. Pump was toast!

I'm sure they were showing a "worst case" from home brewed bio-diesel but it might be worth investigating.

Mike
 
Mike - Thanks. Fortunately I have a CP3, but I've heard the VP44s are less tolerant of deviations from the norm. I haven't seen any objective metric tho...

Thanks for the heads up.

Mark
 
Thanks Mike,



It's good to capture references to this type of information for everyone.



Perhaps because the CP3 is more tolerant, and/or I'm only using 5% or less, but I've had no issues in one year and twenty-something thousand miles.



I tried it in part because of the extensive testing in vehicles in Europe, and because isopropyl alcohol is a commonly used ingredient in additives - including those for diesel. It's typically listed as petroleum products on labels, because that's how it is usually derived.



Still - it's probably as true here as anywhere: we are our own warranty station!



Regards,



Mark

-



This isn't the exact paper I was looking for but it explains the objections

regarding alcohol and the VP44:

http://www.environment.gov.au/atmosphere/fuelquality/publications/pubs/cummins-diesohol.pdf

Mike
 
fuel filters

hello mark



what kinda life are you getting out of your filters on the truck?

mine are lasting around 4 months.



cj hall
 
cj,

I haven't kept track of it lately - typically just watch the fuel pressure and change it when it becomes obvious. I do believe it's been 4-6 months... so I'm probably due.

Between the whole-house (5 micron) filter and the diesel fuel filter from the feed store -- what goes into the tank must be reasonably clean.

Mark
 
fuel filters

Hello Mark

Thanks for the info. we are getting about the same there so thats good.



I am Thinking about the post about the Centrifuge and might be getting one. Using a lot of veg oil and the time it takes to get it settled and filtered is slowing me down. The Centrifuge will get more of the water out with less electric power also it should be cleaner oil if done right. I have three trucks running this fuel and there will be a forth one added soon.



Do you have any thoughts on this.



Thanks

cj hall
 
Hi cj,

I've given the centrifuge a lot of thought too - and think it's a good solution. For me, it's just been a matter of time and money to fuss with it. I like the idea of turning it loose on a tote (275gal) of oil and just letting it run!! When I got around to needing the oil, it would be perfect!

Mark
 
cj - will the centrifuge run when driven by the harbor freight pump or will you need something more substantial?

Also - it would seem to be a good solution for suspended solids and water in emulsion (otherwise suspended), does it work for dissolved water?

Mark
 
Back
Top