
Thanks.
ANDY
If it was needed for unit integrity then why wouldn't they have cast the ring into the design and made it part of the housing? I think the millions of silencer ring-free miles is far better proof of no harm than any engineer's studied opinion.Drewhenry said:I have been talking to many people lately about removing the silencer ring in their turbos. Granted it makes them sound "better" at low RPM, but are they defeating the real purpose. ALL SOUND is created by vibrations. Is the silencer ring a dampening device to reduce harmful vibrations? If so can removing it cause bigger headaches than those sustained by passengers. Any engineers out there that have considered this or can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt there is no harm caused by removal of the silencer ring?
Thanks.
ANDY
Neither did I since mine fell out with only 2 miles on the odometer. :-lafNate said:I hardly even noticied a difference.
nps said:If it was needed for unit integrity then why wouldn't they have cast the ring into the design and made it part of the housing? I think the millions of silencer ring-free miles is far better proof of no harm than any engineer's studied opinion.
nps said:Neither did I since mine fell out with only 2 miles on the odometer. :-laf
Kenny. taylor said:The silencer was developed and put in the turbo at Chrysler's request to calm down turbo noise. They said customer's had complained about the turbo whistle when comparing it to gas engines. Take 'em out and let em whistle or not----makes no difference in performance or air quality.
Kenny Taylor
Holset Turbochargers