DaveHess
TDR MEMBER
I am throwing this out there for comment and/or suggestions. On 3/20/10, I received my latest oil sample report and it includes the last two reports with it. Here is my point of this post: The last two Silicon (Si) readings were 5ppm and 3ppm respectively and that using an OEM (drop-in) AFE PG7 filter. For this last oil change, I switched back to the Fleetguard paper element. The Si on this one was 7ppm. I used the same lab and took the samples the same way. Used the same oil filters and same brand (Valvoline Premium Blue Classic) oil.
I have read posts out here both pro and con regarding filter such as the PG7. I am a little miffed as to how and why the PG7, at least from the reports, filtered better than the paper. I did not expect that. I had thought in the past that a ppm of 5 or 3 was not excessive. Somewhere along the line I had the number 20 as the threshhold for "bad" ppm when it comes to Si. I don't know. Is there a definitive number out the for Si or any of the other items measured in an oil sample that are known "bad" numbers?
I have read posts out here both pro and con regarding filter such as the PG7. I am a little miffed as to how and why the PG7, at least from the reports, filtered better than the paper. I did not expect that. I had thought in the past that a ppm of 5 or 3 was not excessive. Somewhere along the line I had the number 20 as the threshhold for "bad" ppm when it comes to Si. I don't know. Is there a definitive number out the for Si or any of the other items measured in an oil sample that are known "bad" numbers?