Very good questions. Hopefully we’ll get some answers, but for various reasons I doubt we will (I don’t meant that as a slam against anyone, it just appears to be another one of those complicated issues where factory information is scarce and the few in the aftermarket who really understand it feel the info is proprietary).HLewallen said:Okay, I hear opinions on what Smarty setting will kill trannys faster. I still do not hear an explanation for Torque Management. As I understand it, the stock programming for these trucks includes a functionality we call "Torque Management". This limits the engine's torque output to what level, when does it do it, and why? Once this is understood, we can understand the difference between what the Smarty and Bullydog are doing. It sounds like the smarty's TM settings are referring to changing the stock TM parameters, and the bullydog's is something different entirely. Torque management is used by manufacturers to save drivetrains, and it is usually done by de-fueling (right?). My '00 Camaro did it during shifts. It sounds like our trucks do it off the line to keep from spitting drivetrain all over the road. If done with fueling, it is the same thing as low end fueling. If anyone could explain the torque management logic on our trucks I would appreciate it.
Reb. B. said:well, in my opinion, its not Tourque Management (or lack of) that kills transmissions, but low end fuelling. I think Marco gets these two confused sometimes.
TM or fueling, as HLewallen asked, what is the difference? Other than dumping boost with the wastegate, which still requires a reduction in fueling I would think, what else is TM besides fueling?
As far a factory TM, does the ecm or pcm compare engine rpm to transmission output shaft rpm and calculate slippage based upon what gear it is in and then de-fuel from the programmed fuel map? Or is the stock TM really just fueling maps designed to keep the torque below a safe level based on dyno tests DCX/Cummins did when developing the ecm program?