Dilemma
I do not envy President Bush's position in this conflict. If he does nothing and we get hit again (and we WILL get hit again) he will be crucified for doing nothing. If he takes out Hussein and we get hit again (and we WILL get hit again) he will be crucified for provoking the attack.
Apparently there is evidence that the anthrax that appeared in Sen Dashole's mail had Iraqi origins. Iraqi defectors have verified that Saddam is working hard on developing all kinds of WMD's.
War is bad and should be avoided at all costs. But isn't it preferable to living with a knife at your throat?
The people who have declared war on us mean business.
Shouldn't we?
Tim
I do not envy President Bush's position in this conflict. If he does nothing and we get hit again (and we WILL get hit again) he will be crucified for doing nothing. If he takes out Hussein and we get hit again (and we WILL get hit again) he will be crucified for provoking the attack.
Apparently there is evidence that the anthrax that appeared in Sen Dashole's mail had Iraqi origins. Iraqi defectors have verified that Saddam is working hard on developing all kinds of WMD's.
War is bad and should be avoided at all costs. But isn't it preferable to living with a knife at your throat?
The people who have declared war on us mean business.
Shouldn't we?
Tim