Survey of Speeders

[Bill Lins]

No, Dawg- I DON'T like being lied to. I also DON'T like someone who purports to know what he's talking about trying to blow smoke up my or my friends' behinds. Hopefully those reading this thread will have sense enough to consult REAL lawyers and not put themselves in a bind by relying upon your nonsense.



BTW, what is your TBA #?

 

[Sojourner]

No, Dawg- I DON'T like being lied to. I also DON'T like someone who purports to know what he's talking about trying to blow smoke up my or my friends' behinds. Hopefully those reading this thread will have sense enough to consult REAL lawyers and not put themselves in a bind by relying upon your nonsense.



BTW, what is your TBA #?

Bill Lins, only a fool gets a liar (lawyer) to RE-present them (to the court) because they're too **** lazy and stupid to understand the law for themselves (which will put them in like company, because 99% of liars [lawyers] are lazy and stupid).



I have no idea where you get this "blow(ing) smoke" crap - I'm supposing it is coming from your twisted collectivist mind. All I'm doing is pointing out the law, word for word. Are you unable to comprehend plain English???



If you were to objectively go to the trouble of finding out the truth for YOURSELF then you would discover that a liar's (lawyer's) first duty is to the court and NOT to his client (hint: it's found in CJS). When one 'retains' a liar (lawyer), one surrenders to that liar (an officer of the court) and waives any jurisdictional challenge. When one 'appears' in court with a liar RE-presenting one's corporate entity/strawman (not your flesh and blood corporeal body, as your flesh and blood corporeal body is the surety for the debt of the corporate entity/strawman) the court takes 'silent judical notice' that the defendant being RE-presented is either "an infant, idiot, or imbecile" who has a 'legal disability' and is unable to understand what is happening and incompetent to handle their own legal affairs. With a liar RE-presenting one, one is literally a ward of the state.



Maybe we will meet one day at some event and I will show you the degree of freedom I exercise on a daily basis, including the complete lack of corporate state protection racket stickers on the windshields of my Rams. It will likely blow your mind. :--)



Perhaps the next time you find yourself in a jam with the corporate state you will hire a liar, and the liar and the corporate state will act in concert to suck you dry, seeing as presently you deserve to be sucked dry because you're an ignorant person with a poor attitude.

 

[Wayno]

Hey Bill and Dan can yall say " Freeman " .

 

[Paychk]

I would like to be present when he explains his legal theories to a judge, especialy if he uses the same tone as he does here. If there really were a hole that size in the Tx. law, the legislature would have closed it long ago.

 

[Bill Lins]

90 days, jury! When yer hot, cher hot!

 

[E7mack96]

Back to the original topic... .



I drive at the speed limit in residential areas, I drive with traffic in thecity/suburbs, and on the Interstates as fast as I need to. Sometimes, 55-65 or this past Sunday afternoon for example: I got on I-75 north at the 41 mile marker (Kentucky) and crossed into Ohio 1 hour and 41 minutes later. You do the math. I did slow down in construction zones, even though noone was working, and I do slow down upon approach and pass of a vehicle. I tell you, the cummins likes triple digits.