Slingblade said:ViperQA1 is correct. That is exactly why the Navy uses it too.
Deployed USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72)
I second this. There is a reason the military fills thier aicraft tires with nitrogen. (Crew Chief Montana Air Gaurd).
Slingblade said:ViperQA1 is correct. That is exactly why the Navy uses it too.
Deployed USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72)
Nitrogen Instead of Air
Most of the (NASCAR) teams remove the air from the tires and replace it with nitrogen. Compressed nitrogen contains less moisture than compressed air. When the tire heats up, moisture in the tire vaporizes and expands, causing the pressure inside the tire to increase. Even small changes in tire pressure can noticeably affect the handling of the car. By using nitrogen instead of air, the teams have more control over how much the pressure will increase when the tires heat up.
RustyJC said:
george said:Got the nitrogen on board now, went by Costco this morning and had them fill the truck tires then I went home and got the 5er and had its tires filled too.
betterthanstock said:Why not helium? You could load it a little more and still be road-legal.![]()
scootergmc said:I don't know of any longevity benefits, but Nitrogen is used in the roadracing world, and most of my experience dealing with that is from the motorcycle side. The primary benefit, and only one I can remember right now, is temperature resistance, i. e. , the pressure you set is the pressure you will have once the tire is up to temp, which can be a big issue w/ the handling of a motorcycle. That's the only benefit I can see. But if people are willing to pay $5 per tire for nitrogen for their tires, more power to 'em. I'm opening a nitrogen station.
I really see no benefit on the street.
Agreed, but how many people have any control over the moisture content in the air they get? I believe some of the tire balancing powder people offer a moisture blocker to connect between the tire valve and the compressed air source, but how many people will go to the trouble to buy and use such a device? Also, if regular air does leak out at a faster rate, nitrogen may have an advantage for those who do not do regular (or any) pressure checks. Judging from all the severely under inflated tires you can see on the roads, maybe tire shops using nitro is a good thing. (You'll never catch me paying extra for it though)rbattelle said:The gas constant for water vapor is 85. 73 ft*lbf/lbm R, or 61% higher than dry nitrogen.So it makes sense that you'd want to keep water vapor out of your tires.
So why not just use dry air? There aren't really any arguments between nitrogen and dry air, considering the extra cost associated with isolating and compressing the nitrogen, and the associated logistics (unless lack of oxidizer is part of the requirements).
-Ryan
rbattelle said:The gas constant for water vapor is 85. 73 ft*lbf/lbm R, or 61% higher than dry nitrogen.So it makes sense that you'd want to keep water vapor out of your tires.
So why not just use dry air? There aren't really any arguments between nitrogen and dry air, considering the extra cost associated with isolating and compressing the nitrogen, and the associated logistics (unless lack of oxidizer is part of the requirements).
-Ryan
JOblenes said:I phoned my local industrial gas supplier (Praxair) to inquire about the relative pricing of bottled gases and for 99. 98% pure nitrogen it was $CAN 82. 68/cylinder and for "dry" air it was $CAN 96. 20/cylinder.