I have done a bit of towing with each in my 92. I had the 12 for a bit, then put it on the 93 when its pump died. Then I put the "dead" pump in the 92 after I brought it back to life (guide pin in AFC housing was stuck at far Minimum). while I was at it, I put the 18 cm housing from the 93 on it. When pulling about 8000# with the 12, i would see a peak boost of 22-23 psi, and peak EGT of about 900. THis was at 6500 ft, tweaked pump, and stock injectors, stock H1C, K&N, and no muffler. Cruising flat loaded was about 8-10 psi/ 750-800. With the 18, muffler back on, kink over axle gone, paper filter, and a 40'-7500# GN trailer, flat cruising is about 500-600/ 3-6 psi. Peak boost EGT is 21/ 950. This is also on winter fuel, and summer fuel with the 12. HAvent driven enough with the 18 to get mpg, but I figure it will be 15-16 mpg, vs 13-14 with the 12 cm housing, based on EGT differneces alone. My theory on this is that the 12 cm is good for light towing and empty; good spoolup, lower EGTs. But if you tow more than say 7000#, I think a bigger housing allows better breathing, and reduces drive pressure, and EGTs. BUT..... how do the newer trucks do so well with the 12 cm housing? IS the HX35 that much different from the H1C? I have noted that there is an obvious lag with the 18, but I like the lower EGTs while cruising with 7500 lbs lagging behind. Have any of you noticed any similar trends? I plan to get a PDR HX 35 asap. But I might get an e-brake first.
Daniel
PS- should this go in the towing forum? This IS relevent to first gen trucks, though.
Daniel
PS- should this go in the towing forum? This IS relevent to first gen trucks, though.