My puzzelment is the Banks PDA reading of 195! How does that fit into the picture relative to my IR readings?
I'm still hunting for actual OEM sensor placement in my 48RE transmission, and theory of how its temp relates to my other data. Safe travels.
What you are seeing is the difference between radiated temp and actual temp in the fluid body or stream. Since the OE temp sensor is part of the gov pressure transducer, its immersed in the center of the fluid sump.
The same thing happens when your shooting lines, manifold, etc. The radiated heat is ONLY from the surface temp and than is always cooler than the center of any body of liquid or solid. The cooler outer layers act like an insulating blanket to trap the heat internally because only so much heat can be radiated from a finite surface area.
I am going to get booed and hissed for this but I have asbestos shorts so here goes.

The IR guns have their place and uses but are not really a good indicator of actual temps. Temp differences from a standard yes, actual temp no. I call them a Buzz Lightyear Ray Gun when somebody tries to rely on their readings as a substitute for a probe in the stream of what is measured.

Like I said, for surface temps differences they are fine but you need a comparitive to make sense of the readings. The error factor can run from 10% to 50% depending on the thermal conductivity and density of the material being IR'ed.
The difference of 175 IR to 195 OE sensor is perfectly normal and right in the operating range for what you were doing. Sump fluid is a mixture of lube\cooled fluid after is has gone thru the cooler then been used to lube thrusr washers, bearings, etc, AND (this is important) fluid used in the TC. for lockup and fluid coupling.
In fluid couling a lot higher percentage of fluid used in the TC is dumped directly to the sump to keep the volume available for use than when the TC clutch is locked.
You also have to remeber the data stream from the ECU that it is interpreting from the OE sensor has been interpolated to a degree and manipulated by routines in the ECU. In addtion, the signal is analog voltage to represent a temp value then is converted to digital for propogation to the data bus. Exact is not a word that can be assigned to the run of the mill sensors in these units, a large ball park is closer to the truth because of the potential variances and conversion errors.
Given what I have seen from monitors, if you had a probe in the same place as the OE sensor it would probably read 185. It all sounds well within the normal parameters and even on the low side given the ambients.
Drive. Be happy.
